2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2019.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracing architects' fragile knowing about users in the socio-material environment of design practice

Abstract: The increasing complexity of architectural practice presents a challenge to transferring knowledge from use to design contexts, leaving attending to user experience an implicit design dimension. An ethnographic study in three firms sheds light on how knowledge about user experienceunpacked into facets of perception, activity and meaningis embedded in architectural practice. It offers insight into the fragile nature of knowledge about user experience, as it is largely contingent, implicit and essentially person… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate that familiarity with the customer's context in terms of sharing a cultural background, or even through a short-period visiting, increases the accuracy of empathic understanding. Van der Linden, Dong, and Heylighen (2019) have theorised the benefits of user research, and it is heavily recommended by design practitioners (Mattelmäki, Vaajakallio, and Koskinen 2014;Smeenk, Tomico Plasencia, and van Turnhout 2016), but this study is among the first to quantitatively measure the influence of national cultural differences on empathic understanding. Even a short and potentially generic immersion (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicate that familiarity with the customer's context in terms of sharing a cultural background, or even through a short-period visiting, increases the accuracy of empathic understanding. Van der Linden, Dong, and Heylighen (2019) have theorised the benefits of user research, and it is heavily recommended by design practitioners (Mattelmäki, Vaajakallio, and Koskinen 2014;Smeenk, Tomico Plasencia, and van Turnhout 2016), but this study is among the first to quantitatively measure the influence of national cultural differences on empathic understanding. Even a short and potentially generic immersion (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of specific methods related to design is scarce (the discussion about this concern is dealt with in detail below). Ethnography is used in three cases (Comi et al, 2019), (Roesler et al, 2019) and (Van der Linden et al, 2019b) -also the annotation as observation in the tables -and one more paper uses ethnography as the study focus (Wood & Mattson, 2019).…”
Section: Strategies Of Inquiry and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help enable inclusion, this research turns instead to practitioner real-world experiences as a foundation for uptake. Despite their best efforts to understand an issue such as inclusion, project stakeholders may be unfamiliar with how built environments can disable [17]. This research chooses to learn about the lived experiences of practitioners who are attuned to designing inclusively either from their own disabling experiences, their roles within a project or company, or their self-motivated advocacy to improve the quality of life of those disabled by buildings, spaces, and products and services.…”
Section: Approach To Inquiry and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%