Trace-Based Weighting Approach for Multiple Criteria Decision Making

Abstract

Decision-making has evolved as an interesting research problem for decision community. We consider a decision problem that takes into account several criteria called Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) in an interactive application for adaptive execution. In this paper, we present a method for automatically weighting criteria generation based on users' traces. In our method, we suggest a process that contains all steps describing alternately what is necessary to prepare in order to weight all criteria. We propose a modified method using Naïve Bayes network to exploit the traces (the past of users), there will be used as information for estimating the score of criteria. Experimental results are presented to illustrate a full process and an automatic generation of weighting criteria by a set of values.

Convergence or Divergence among Business Models of Public Bus Transport Authorities across the Globe: A Fuzzy Approach

“…Besides, for the experts who were working as managers, being employed in different departments such as planning, operation, innovation, strategy development, and finance were preferred to create a holistic perspective in the evaluation of the developed business model. In summary, the survey design is framed regarding MCDM methods [71].…”

Testbed Evaluation of Self-Adaptive Trust Model for Cooperative Geographic Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks

“…The inputs are application dependent. For examples, elearning system utilizes user traces [23]; social networking systems utilize a number of link clicks [24], etc. The current study considers the behavior of nodes as the primary concern in routing the packets from the source to the destination.…”

Approche de présélection multicritère à base de traces pour la prise de décision dans les applications interactives de type jeux

“…En combinant les aspects de décision et de traces, nous avons proposé dans (Ho et al, 2014) un processus général de décision multicritère à base de traces (illustré en figure 1). Nous avons repris le modèle du système d'aide à la décision classique en ajoutant les traces dans les trois dernières étapes du processus général : celle de la pondération des critères (Étape 2) (Ho et al, 2014), celle de la prise de décision (Étape 4) (Ho et al, 2015(Ho et al, , 2016 et celle d'identification des solutions candidates (Étape 3), objet du présent article.…”