2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2855719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Smart Work Clothing for Automatic Risk Assessment of Physical Workload

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of these sensor-based technical solutions provide kinematics data or perform classification of the type of physical activity [ 42 , 43 ], but only a few have integrated a system for automatic mapping of the kinematics data to research-based risk level metrics that can be used for occupational applications for the risk assessment of physical workloads or MSDs risk factors [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of these sensor-based technical solutions provide kinematics data or perform classification of the type of physical activity [ 42 , 43 ], but only a few have integrated a system for automatic mapping of the kinematics data to research-based risk level metrics that can be used for occupational applications for the risk assessment of physical workloads or MSDs risk factors [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the handful of existing systems, the risk assessment usually includes mapping of the kinematics data to criteria derived from research-based observation tools, e.g., the Strain Index [ 48 , 49 ], the Ovako Working Posture Assessment System (OWAS) [ 50 , 51 , 52 ], the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) [ 45 , 52 , 53 , 54 ], the Revised NIOSH lifting equation [ 52 , 55 , 56 ], or a single criterion associated with, for example, the maximal acceptable levels of energy expenditure to avoid global (whole-body) fatigue [ 44 ], or a criterion based on threshold values associated with an increased risk of developing MSDs based on epidemiological studies [ 47 ]. The risk assessment may give useful information that can be used for the guidance of measures and evaluation of the effectiveness of previously implemented measures [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many industries, it is also common work-related musculoskeletal and cardiovascular disorders, which are often due to excessive workload. To improve traditional risk assessments, which are usually performed via self-reports or observations and that have relatively low reliability, the authors of [221] developed a smart vest with diverse sensors (i.e., ECG, Thoracic Electrical Bio-impedance (TEB), an Internal Measurement Unit (IMU)) that were connected through Bluetooth to an Android tablet where data were processed, stored and visualized.…”
Section: Industry Defense and Public Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has already been explored in many other areas, such as the military and sports (Buttussi and Chittaro 2008;Coyle et al 2009;Seoane et al 2014;Mohino-Herranz et al 2015). There is an ongoing research effort aiming at developing smart wearable systems for automatic risk assessment at work, which facilitate risk identification, communication and interventions for better work environments (Yang, Grooten, and Forsman 2017;Abtahi et al 2017;Lind et al 2019;Eklund and Forsman 2018;Yang et al 2018). One step towards this aim is to evaluate methods that are applicable for estimating work metabolism (WM) with wearable sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%