The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'05)
DOI: 10.1109/wi.2005.150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Tuplespace-Based Middleware for the Semantic Web

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because we want to express general reactions that apply to specific tuples independently of their syntactic structure, which cannot be clearly foreseen at design time. Accordingly, semantic matching can be considered as a proper matching criterion for our coordination infrastructure [Paolucci et al 2002;Bandara et al 2008;Bobillo and Straccia 2008;Tolksdorf et al 2008;Giunchiglia et al 2007].…”
Section: The Spatial Coordination Model Of Chemical Tuple Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because we want to express general reactions that apply to specific tuples independently of their syntactic structure, which cannot be clearly foreseen at design time. Accordingly, semantic matching can be considered as a proper matching criterion for our coordination infrastructure [Paolucci et al 2002;Bandara et al 2008;Bobillo and Straccia 2008;Tolksdorf et al 2008;Giunchiglia et al 2007].…”
Section: The Spatial Coordination Model Of Chemical Tuple Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the aforementioned benefits of tuple-based coordination in terms of knowledge-based coordination fade in front of the problems it induces in terms of syntax-for example, two tuples containing the same data may not match due to differences in the tuple structure-and (mostly) of semantics-for example, two tuples representing the same information may not match based on a different syntax adopted. Till now, the problem has been faced according to two different perspectives: (i) by exploiting tuple-based coordination within a middleware for knowledge-intensive environments: for example, Tolksdorf et al (2008) experiments with a tuple-based coordination within Semantic Web middleware, while Nixon et al (2008) survey similar approaches; or, (ii) by enhancing the tuple space abstraction with a semantic interpretation: for example, Nardini et al (2010) extend tuple spaces with a description logic framework so as to equip each tuple, template and operation over tuple spaces with a well-founded semantic interpretation.…”
Section: Coordination In Self-organising Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on existing works in the field of coordination models and languages [6,33,34,36], middlewares for context-aware applications [5,16,24], and on models of concurrency and bio-inspired computing [9,22,25], we adopt a model based on the idea of continuously reflecting the presence and activities of components in the pervasive computing system through Live Semantic Annotations (LSAs), which are stored across computational devices, and altogether form a global network of annotations representing the virtual counterpart of the ecosystem. Ecosystem behaviour is regulated by a set of laws, called eco-laws, which act locally on each node and its neighbourhood, combining and manipulating annotations using a chemical style and semantic pattern matching [37,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%