2020
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a framework for understanding the context dependence of impacts of non‐native tree species

Abstract: 1. Biological invasions are a major driver of ecosystem change but causes of variation in their environmental impacts over space and time remain poorly understood. Most approaches used to quantify the impacts of non-native species assume there are interactions among per capita (i.e. individual level) effects, species abundance and the area occupied by the species. However, studies rarely evaluate these factors and their interactions and often fail to recognize that the magnitude of impacts can be highly contex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in contrast to our own findings, a strong trade‐off was found between seed mass and terminal velocity for P. sylvestris in France (Debain et al., 2003). Thus, it is likely that, as with other aspects of Pinus life history, relationships between seed mass and terminal velocity appear strongly context‐dependent (Sapsford et al., 2020). Surprisingly, the relatively few studies that have examined within‐species relationships between seed mass and dispersal potential in other taxa have all found negative relationships (Chen & Giladi, 2020; Larios & Venable, 2015; Skarpaas, Silverman, Jongeians, & Shea, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in contrast to our own findings, a strong trade‐off was found between seed mass and terminal velocity for P. sylvestris in France (Debain et al., 2003). Thus, it is likely that, as with other aspects of Pinus life history, relationships between seed mass and terminal velocity appear strongly context‐dependent (Sapsford et al., 2020). Surprisingly, the relatively few studies that have examined within‐species relationships between seed mass and dispersal potential in other taxa have all found negative relationships (Chen & Giladi, 2020; Larios & Venable, 2015; Skarpaas, Silverman, Jongeians, & Shea, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, lack of difference in soil C:N ratio between invaded and non-invaded poor P. sylvestris forests does not support this suggestion. Different patterns of P. serotina impacts on bryophytes in P. sylvestris plantations and poor forests are an example of the context-dependence of biological invasion (González-Moreno et al 2014; Dyderski and Jagodziński 2019b;Sapsford et al 2020). Here, a mismatch between habitat fertility and forest species composition changed the impact of an invasive tree species on bryophytes.…”
Section: Impact Of Prunus Serotina On Terricolous Bryophytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the ecosystem services provided by NNT, whilst minimising their detrimental impacts (Brundu and Richardson 2016), for example, by identifying ecosystem types or demarcated areas where they can be cultivated with a low risk of invasion (Rouget et al 2002). Invasion risks of NNT strongly depend on the type of ecosystem (Pyšek et al 2012;Sapsford et al 2020;Vor et al 2015) emphasizing the importance for analysing the spatial extent for potential or existing invasive NNT (Hawkins et al 2015;Rouget et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%