2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00226-013-0568-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward improved understanding of the cell-wall density and porosity of wood determined by gas pycnometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
39
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
39
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Kellogg and Wangaard (1969) after analyzing 18 species found that ρ walls values range from 1497 to 1517 kg m −3 for the hardwoods and from 1517 to 1529 kg m −3 for the softwoods studied. This result contradicts the findings of Zauer et al (2013) who observed lower cell wall density in softwood than in hardwood. In a recent study, Plötze and Niemz (2011) obtained an average value of 1493 kg m −3 with a minimum of 1458 kg m −3 for Nauclea diderrichii and a maximum of 1528 kg m −3 for Q. robur.…”
Section: Advantages and Drawbacks Of The Methodscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kellogg and Wangaard (1969) after analyzing 18 species found that ρ walls values range from 1497 to 1517 kg m −3 for the hardwoods and from 1517 to 1529 kg m −3 for the softwoods studied. This result contradicts the findings of Zauer et al (2013) who observed lower cell wall density in softwood than in hardwood. In a recent study, Plötze and Niemz (2011) obtained an average value of 1493 kg m −3 with a minimum of 1458 kg m −3 for Nauclea diderrichii and a maximum of 1528 kg m −3 for Q. robur.…”
Section: Advantages and Drawbacks Of The Methodscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The value of 1500 kg m −3 is widely accepted in the fields of tree growth and wood quality. It is known, however, that ρ walls density depends on species, sample preparation, and the method of measurement (Zauer et al 2013). Stamm (1929) obtained values for ρ walls between 1484 and 1536 kg m −3 .…”
Section: Advantages and Drawbacks Of The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…El cálculo de su correlación: A = 3.65 j + 103, con un coeficiente de determinación (R 2 ) de 0.15, sugiere que no existe una relación entre la porosidad de la madera y la absorción de sales de boro. La magnitud de las porosidades estimadas son similares a las propuestas por Zauer et al (2013) Zauer et al (2013Zauer et al ( y 2014, la determinación de la absorción de una madera depende igualmente del método de medición y del estado tecnológico de la muestra estudiada.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Respecto a la porosidad de maderas mexicanas, Sotomayor-Castellanos & Ramírez-Pérez (2013) relacionan y clasifican valores del paráme-tro de porcentaje de espacios vacíos para 134 especies nacionales. El porcentaje de espacios vacíos representa la magnitud de la porosidad de la madera de acuerdo con los trabajos de Plötze & Niemz (2011), Tondi et al (2012), Zauer, Pfriem & Wagenführ (2013 y Zauer, Hempel, Pfriem, Mechtcherine & Wagenführ (2014).…”
unclassified