2019
DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Explaining Nitrogen and Phosphorus Trends in Chesapeake Bay Tributaries, 1992–2012

Abstract: Understanding trends in stream chemistry is critical to watershed management, and often complicated by multiple contaminant sources and landscape conditions changing over varying time scales. We adapted spatially referenced regression (SPARROW) to infer causes of recent nutrient trends in Chesapeake Bay tributaries by relating observed fluxes during 1992, 2002, and 2012 to contemporary inputs and watershed conditions. The annual flow‐normalized nitrogen flux to the bay from its watershed declined by 14% to 127… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
92
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(142 reference statements)
3
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with recent studies showing regional (46,47) and national (41,42) improvements to U.S. streams and rivers (41,42,46,47) and lakes (42) in nutrient loads, they have shown declines in suspended sediments, consistent with improved sediment management practices (41). These recorded improvements in streams and rivers provide a mechanism for increasing lake water clarity, as changes in fluvial systems often equate to changes in sediment and nutrient inputs to lakes (48).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results are consistent with recent studies showing regional (46,47) and national (41,42) improvements to U.S. streams and rivers (41,42,46,47) and lakes (42) in nutrient loads, they have shown declines in suspended sediments, consistent with improved sediment management practices (41). These recorded improvements in streams and rivers provide a mechanism for increasing lake water clarity, as changes in fluvial systems often equate to changes in sediment and nutrient inputs to lakes (48).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Substantial increases in forest standing stock are common in Finland, Sweden and Norway (de Wit, Austnes, Hylen, & Dalsgaard, 2015; Luyssaert et al, 2010) suggesting that increased nitrogen uptake by forests may affect NO 3 leaching from forested catchments elsewhere in the Nordic region. In Chesapeake Bay, USA, a watershed with considerably higher proportion of agriculture and developed areas than the Nordic countries, declines in atmospheric N deposition were found to be the second‐most important factor responsible for the decrease in N export to the bay (Ator, Garcia, Schwarz, Blomquist, & Sekellick, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA, most of this manure is land applied, and regulations discourage application rates that might exceed what plants can take up. Handling, storage and application of this manure and the associated nutrients to soils have contributed to impairment of air and water quality (US-EPA, 2012; Harter et al ., 2017; LCBP, 2018; Ator et al ., 2019). Meanwhile, most cropland is fertilized with imported synthetic fertilizers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%