1998
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<3283:tcrmol>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Cloud Resolving Modeling of Large-Scale Tropical Circulations: A Simple Cloud Microphysics Parameterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
248
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
248
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If more emphasis is placed on the analysis of mesoscale convective features (Yamasaki 2006), the implementation is likely to be significant. We used a cloud microphysics scheme (Grabowski 1998) that treats two classes of solid phases consisting of cloud ice and snow. Major improvements in the physical schemes from the previous version of the model ) include an upgraded version of the turbulent boundary layer scheme (Nakanishi and Niino 2004), in which the thermodynamical effects of the subgrid scale condensation were incorporated (Noda et al 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If more emphasis is placed on the analysis of mesoscale convective features (Yamasaki 2006), the implementation is likely to be significant. We used a cloud microphysics scheme (Grabowski 1998) that treats two classes of solid phases consisting of cloud ice and snow. Major improvements in the physical schemes from the previous version of the model ) include an upgraded version of the turbulent boundary layer scheme (Nakanishi and Niino 2004), in which the thermodynamical effects of the subgrid scale condensation were incorporated (Noda et al 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the physical reasoning discussed above and the support of this reasoning based on observations and theoretical work, it is probably unreasonable to expect that these relationships even qualitatively describe the relationship between the local values of the shape parameter and droplet concentrations within clouds. Instead, it appears that parameterizations such as the one proposed by Grabowski (1998) (dashed gray line in Fig. 7a) are more suitable for largeeddy simulations.…”
Section: Implication For Parameterizationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With this relationship, D n can be solved for if n is known. However, in single-and double-moment bulk microphysics schemes, n is not known, and must be set to some constant value or diagnosed in some other way (Grabowski 1998;Rotstayn and Liu 2003;Morrison and Grabowski 2007;Thompson et al 2008;Geoffroy et al 2010). On the other hand, triplemoment schemes (Milbrandt and Yau 2005b;Shipway and Hill 2012;Loftus and Cotton 2014), which additionally predict the sixth moment of the distribution, can explicitly solve for this remaining parameter of the gamma distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model in Eq. 10 already incorporates a number of key features at large scales in a CRM method for the equatorial wave guide (7)(8)(9). The CRM approach on the coarse-grained large scales would involve additional nonlinear advection terms in Eq.…”
Section: The Equatorial Primitive Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…therein). A particularly promising emerging approach to address these issues is cloud-resolving modeling (CRM), where idealized highly resolved two-dimensional simulations of clouds are coupled to largerscale dynamics in a variety of ways (7)(8)(9), utilizing massively parallel computer architecture. Nevertheless, only very crude resolution of the large-scale interaction is possible with the current generation of computers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%