Toward a unified theory of economic reform

Abstract

The dichotomy in the economics of transition literature with regard to the reform speed (Gradualist vs Radical Approach) and reform strategy (incremental reform vs structural reform) fails to capture the essence of the transitional process of a transitional economy that was ever under the control of planned economic system. In this paper, we construct a system dynamics model to provide a unified theoretical framework to illustrate that reform speed and reform strategy are inherently intertwined. We propose 4 optimal reforming combinations between reform speed and reform strategy to track the transitional trajectories of different transitional economies since 1980s. These 4 optimal reforming combinations are: (1) Incremental reform in radical speed. (2) Incremental reform in gradualist speed. (3) Structural reform in radical speed. (4) Structural reform in gradualist speed. In this paper, we demonstrate that a transitional economy would adopt one of the aforementioned 4 optimal reforming combination if and only if it minimizes the reforming cost incurred during the shock period of radical reform as well as the dual track period of gradualist reforms. Several factors in our model affecting these 4 optimal reforming combinations are also discussed. These factors include the spillover effect (both vertical and horizontal) of a newly established reforming promotion sector on other old sectors in a transitional economy, the endogenous reform damping coefficient determined by one transitional economy"s initial conditions and the reform damping coefficient determined by the dual track system during the gradualist reform process.

Effect of Trade Openness on Food Security in the EU: A Dynamic Panel Analysis

“…This particular methodology allows to capture the dynamic aspects of the commercial reforms and to face the problem of the potential endogeneity that could derive from this specification. In fact, the continuous evolution of economic processes means that the effect of economic and trade policies is completely evident only in the long run [33]. Therefore, the dynamic model allows one to consider the effects of explanatory variables over time.…”

“…Table A1. List of European countries used in the analysis (33), because the data are available for this countries.…”

Levels of Structural Change: An Analysis of China's Development Push 1998-2014

“…However, China's development and transformation to a market economy was in many ways not spontaneous or unorganized, different perhaps form other transformation economies in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. There was structural change towards a market oriented system, but the transformation was government-organized and the economy remains partly under the control of the planned economic system (Shen et al, 2019). For example, early reforms in the 1970s and 1980s encouraged local management and stakeholders to assume a more active role in defining the firms' objectives and strategy, first in agricultural TVEs, later in other SOEs (Naughton, 2008).2 Before 1998, the ownership type of the firms was rarely changed and state ownership was typically retained.…”

Sectoral productivity in Hungarian economy: an input-output linkages approach

“…This led to more effective allocation of resources, resulting in improved levels of productivity. Shen, Liu and Zeng (2018) pinpointed an interesting fact, applicable to the Hungarian economy, that the transition process can affect the speed of reforms. As such, reform strategy includes the spillover effect through different sectors in addition to the initial economic governance structure and leadership.…”