Toughness of the Virunga mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei) diet across an altitudinal gradient

Abstract

The robust masticatory system of mountain gorillas is thought to have evolved for the comminution of tough vegetation, yet, compared to other primates, the toughness of the mountain gorilla diet is unremarkable. This may be a result of low plant toughness in the mountain gorilla environment or of mountain gorillas feeding selectively on low-toughness foods. The goal of this paper is to determine how the toughness of the mountain gorilla diet varies across their habitat, which spans a large altitudinal range, and whether there is a relationship between toughness and food selection by mountain gorillas. We collected data on the following variables to determine whether, and if so how, they change with altitude: leaf toughness of two plant species consumed by mountain gorillas, at every 100 m increase in altitude (2,600-3,700 m); toughness of consumed foods comprising over 85% of the gorilla diet across five vegetation zones; and toughness of unconsumed/infrequently consumed plant parts of those foods. Although leaf toughness increased with altitude, the toughness of the gorilla diet remained similar. There was a negative relationship between toughness and consumption frequency, and toughness was a better predictor of consumption frequency than plant frequency, biomass, and density. Consumed plant parts were less tough than unconsumed/infrequently consumed parts and toughness of the latter increased with altitude. Although it is unclear whether gorillas select food based on toughness or use toughness as a sensory cue to impart other plant properties (e.g., macronutrients, chemicals), our results that gorillas maintain a consistent low-toughness dietary profile across altitude, despite toughness increasing with altitude, suggest that the robust gorilla masticatory apparatus evolved for repetitive mastication of foods that are not high in toughness.

Biting mechanics and niche separation in a specialized clade of primate seed predators

“…Much-needed research exploring the relationship between primate food mechanical/structural properties and their ecological significance has been growing in recent years (e.g., [ 31 , 36 , 48 , 107 – 117 ]). With respect to pitheciines, Norconk and colleagues [ 9 , 26 , 32 ] quantify fruit and seeds eaten by Pithecia and Chiropotes in terms of their puncture and crushing resistance (i.e., structural properties).…”

Incisor tooth wear and age determination in mountain gorillas from Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda

“…Incisor height may be influenced by many factors. Besides tooth size differences among individuals from the same population, there may also be differences in tooth wear rates at the individual and/or population level, which may be attributed to differences in such factors as feeding ecology or food toughness (Galbany et al, 2016;Glowacka et al, 2016Glowacka et al, , 2017, or paramasticatory activities involving the incisors. A good example of the latter is the potential cultural trait "tooth-climbing", which is absent in the Virunga mountain gorillas but customary in Bwindi mountain gorillas who use incisors as a '5 th limb' while climbing trees (Robbins et al, 2016).…”

Effects of diet and age–sex class on the fecal particle size of wild Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata yakui)

“…In general, primates are not outstanding in terms of food comminution compared to taxa specialized for folivory (e.g., ruminants and equids) (Dunbar & Bose, 1991;Fritz et al, 2009;Matsuda et al, 2014). They are very likely to compensate for such disadvantages with other strategies, such as avoiding mechanically challenging food (Glowacka et al, 2017;Hill & Lucas, 1996;Teaford et al, 2006). Therefore, although fecal particle size has proved to be a useful tool for ecophysiology studies of many mammalian HE ET AL.…”