2018
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incisor tooth wear and age determination in mountain gorillas from Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda

Abstract: This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among all features related to external morphology, the single best predictor of age after juvenile stage (≥1 year) was tooth attrition, which is consistent with other minimally invasive aging studies using known-age individuals (Chevallier et al, 2017;Delahay et al, 2011;Galbany et al, 2018;Gipson et al, 2000;Stander, 1997). Wild sea otters are primarily susceptible to dental attrition from foraging on hard-shelled invertebrates (Fisher, 1941;Kenyon, 1969;Winer, Liong, & Verstraete, 2013), many which burrow in sand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among all features related to external morphology, the single best predictor of age after juvenile stage (≥1 year) was tooth attrition, which is consistent with other minimally invasive aging studies using known-age individuals (Chevallier et al, 2017;Delahay et al, 2011;Galbany et al, 2018;Gipson et al, 2000;Stander, 1997). Wild sea otters are primarily susceptible to dental attrition from foraging on hard-shelled invertebrates (Fisher, 1941;Kenyon, 1969;Winer, Liong, & Verstraete, 2013), many which burrow in sand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For each age estimate, we also defined an aging error, ranging from <1 day (for a known birth event) to 3 years (for individuals first examined as aged adults). A (±) 3‐year maximum error is consistent with other studies quantifying the precision of aging carnivores from tooth wear only (Chevallier et al., 2017; Galbany et al., 2018; Gipson et al., 2000).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In three cases, uncertainty in birth date (and thus age) ranged between ±1.5 and ±4 years (see electronic supplementary material, table S1 for details). Ages for 10 other individuals were estimated from incisor tooth wear using population-specific formulae developed for the MGSP sample [33] and for one individual from dental developmental maturity [34]. One additional individual was included in lumbar vertebral but not long bone analyses; its age was estimated from tooth wear [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ages for 10 other individuals were estimated from incisor tooth wear using population-specific formulae developed for the MGSP sample [33] and for one individual from dental developmental maturity [34]. One additional individual was included in lumbar vertebral but not long bone analyses; its age was estimated from tooth wear [33]. Age distributions by sex are shown in figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%