2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total cost of ownership, payback, and consumer preference modeling of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Factor analysis indicates that state strategic support and charging point placement are crucial elements to EVs spread adoption [9,25,26,35]. It supports the hypotheses 3 and 4.…”
Section: Public Policy and Price Incentivesupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Factor analysis indicates that state strategic support and charging point placement are crucial elements to EVs spread adoption [9,25,26,35]. It supports the hypotheses 3 and 4.…”
Section: Public Policy and Price Incentivesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…It verifies the public policy driven and environmental knowledge education from the central and local government of China. Consistence with previous findings, an inverse proportional to the preference in regression analysis indicates that consumers also aim for lower using cost with EVs [11,21,26].…”
Section: Preference For Evsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This paper shows that the cost of unachievable VMT has a significant impact on the TCO modeling, such that if another low cost vehicle (e.g., second conventional vehicle in house) is available, the BEV-75 is more cost effective than having another conventional vehicle. A TCO model of PHEVs with details such as maintenance costs, and salvage value are formulated in [129]. This paper compares the proposed model with previous studies in this area and demonstrates using a sensitivity analysis that the results are very sensitive to the value of uncertain parameters like fuel cost.…”
Section: Ev Types and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, the maintenance and energy cost of EVs are much less than that of the conventional one. In order to help customers to choose a vehicle type, TCO of EVs is investigated in [124,[128][129][130]. In [128], TCO for annual VMT is developed based on a large data set of driving profiles from Germany.…”
Section: Ev Types and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, a significant amount of attention has been given to PHEVs in the scientific literature. Popular topics are the optimization of battery capacity [28,[31][32][33], the environmental impact of the dual technology [34,35], and total cost of ownership [36][37][38][39]. Whereas the automotive industry regards PHEVs as an important asset for reaching future GHG and pollutant emission targets [40], the question remains which future market share this expensive dual technology is destined for, as EVs are gaining momentum and battery innovation aims for driving ranges equaling those of conventional petrol cars, while the cost difference decreases as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%