2000
DOI: 10.1063/1.1310187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topography-induced contributions to friction forces measured using an atomic force/friction force microscope

Abstract: Most friction studies using an atomic force/friction force microscope, while concentrating on material-induced effects, often present users with conflicting and confusing interpretations of the topography-induced friction forces. It has been generally reported that topography-induced contributions are independent of scanning direction and can be removed by subtracting friction data from forward and backward scans. In this article, we present friction studies on samples with well-defined topography variations a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This dependence was first reported by , and Bhushan (1995) and later discussed in more detail by Koinkar & Bhushan (1997a) and Sundararajan & Bhushan (2000). The ratchet mechanism and the collision effects semi-quantitatively explain the correlation between the slopes of the roughness maps and friction force maps observed.…”
Section: (B ) Microscale Frictionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This dependence was first reported by , and Bhushan (1995) and later discussed in more detail by Koinkar & Bhushan (1997a) and Sundararajan & Bhushan (2000). The ratchet mechanism and the collision effects semi-quantitatively explain the correlation between the slopes of the roughness maps and friction force maps observed.…”
Section: (B ) Microscale Frictionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Parameters such as roughness, granularity, power spectrum of the surface play an important role. The effects of surface topography on nano-friction measurements have been studied, although a general theory is still lacking [8,9,10,11,12]. In many cases, attention has been concentrated on flat crystalline surfaces under ultra-high-vacuum (UHV), where the influence of surface topography is negligible [13,14,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, in the case of corrugated samples, that is of locally tilted surfaces, the measured forces in the directions parallel and perpendicular to the AFM reference plane do not necessarily coincide with the forces acting parallel and perpendicularly to the sample surface, which actually define the friction coefficient and the friction vs. load characteristics of the interface under investigation [8,9,10,11,12]. These effects related to surface morphology depend on the ratio between the dimension of the sliding probe and that of the surface asperities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Contact between solid surfaces is generally via a multitude of asperities that together constitute the microscopic roughness of any real surface. In AFM/LFM, the contact between the tip and the surface is usually assumed to be of a single asperity nature; 7 this is a good assumption, and can be helpful in understanding multiasperity behavior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%