1986
DOI: 10.1159/000118232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographic Differences between Normals and Schizophrenics: The N120 Evoked Potential Component

Abstract: Topographic differences in evoked potentials were measured in 20 off-medication chronic schizophrenics and 24 normal controls. Four intensities of brief electrical shocks were administered to the subject’s right forearm in a random order at 1-second intervals. Evoked potentials (EPs) were recorded from the scalp over the left hemisphere. The EP data from 16 left hemisphere leads were used to generate EP maps of brain response for individual subjects. The maps were normalized by z transformation. Group mean map… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors interpreted these results as reflecting impaired reticular filtering or subcortical modulating, which results in abnormal amounts of information reaching higher brain centers. Buchsbaum et al (1986) reported that somatosensory responses (to mild shocks to the right forearm) from the left hemisphere in normal subjects were highly localized in the sensorimotor and parietal areas of the brain, as noted from topographic mapping. Schizophrenic patients, however, showed responses that were diffused rather than localized.…”
Section: Event-related Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The authors interpreted these results as reflecting impaired reticular filtering or subcortical modulating, which results in abnormal amounts of information reaching higher brain centers. Buchsbaum et al (1986) reported that somatosensory responses (to mild shocks to the right forearm) from the left hemisphere in normal subjects were highly localized in the sensorimotor and parietal areas of the brain, as noted from topographic mapping. Schizophrenic patients, however, showed responses that were diffused rather than localized.…”
Section: Event-related Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The defect was not observed with the visual EP using similar paradigms (Adler et al 1985). Using backward masking, Patterson et al (1986) suggest EP deficits in schizophrenic subjects at intervals < 100 ms. Reports of abnormalities in EP responses of schizophrenics continue to appear regularly (e.g., Morstyn et al 1983; Steinhauer 1985; Buchsbaum et al 1986). The results are exciting because they offer the potential of matching sensory deficits to neurophysiological substrates through topographical mapping of the EPs.…”
Section: Information-processing Studies In Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial topographic maps of selective attention enhancement of evoked potential amplitude showed a temporoparietal, rather than frontal, difference between normals and schizophrenics, however (Buchsbaum et al 1982c). A somatosensory stimulus produced topographic differences in somatosensory cortex (Buchsbaum et al 1986a), suggesting the importance of stimulus modality and task for locale of EP differences.…”
Section: Computer Electroencephalographic Topography (Cet)mentioning
confidence: 99%