1953
DOI: 10.6028/jres.050.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Titanium-uranium system in the region 0 to 30 atomic percent of titanium

Abstract: The tentative t itanium-uranium phase diagram has been amplified by thermal, microscopic, and X-ray analyses of a lloys in the range 0 to 30 atomic percent of titanium. The system is characterized by a peritectic reaction which occurs at 1,180 0 C, and by two solidsolu tion phases which decompose eutectoidly, one at 718 0 C and 5 atomic percent of titanium, the other at 830 0 C and 18.3 atomic percent of titanium. The alpha-beta transformation in uranium is increased from 657 0 to 667 0 C by titanium and the b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However she used lattice stabilities incompatible with SGTE and this cannot be used in the Fuelbase project. During the present reassessment, the experimental phase diagram determined by Buzzard and coworkers [13] are not considered as it is inconsistent with other works due to important contamination but the other experimental phase diagrams previously assessed by Murray [14][15][16][17] as well as the work by Linard [18] that she seems not to have been aware about, all in reasonable agreement. Most of these experimental results are shown on Fig.…”
Section: Uranium-titanium Systemsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…However she used lattice stabilities incompatible with SGTE and this cannot be used in the Fuelbase project. During the present reassessment, the experimental phase diagram determined by Buzzard and coworkers [13] are not considered as it is inconsistent with other works due to important contamination but the other experimental phase diagrams previously assessed by Murray [14][15][16][17] as well as the work by Linard [18] that she seems not to have been aware about, all in reasonable agreement. Most of these experimental results are shown on Fig.…”
Section: Uranium-titanium Systemsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…To avoid this, alloys for subsequent heat treatment were wrapped in molybdenum sheet prior to sealing in the silica tubing; no molybdenum contamination was detected by chemical tests. The homogenized specimens were subsequently sealed individually in silica tubing, reheated to selected temperatures, and quenched in ice water, using the nickel-block technique [ 5 ]. Quenching temperatures were measured with a Pt versus Pt–10 percent Rh thermocouple, previously calibrated against a standard thermocouple, which under the experimental conditions was accurate to ±2° C. In determining the solubility of platinum in uranium, the specimens were heated into the gamma range, then cooled to the desired temperature, and quenched.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data of Ti-U system. Buzzard et al [1] examined alloys in the range 0 to 30 at.% titanium by thermal analysis, microscopic examination, and X-ray methods. Their results show a peritectic reaction which occurs at 1180 ℃ , and two solid solution phases which decompose eutectoidally, one at 718℃ and 5 at.% titanium, the other at 830℃ and 18.3 at.% titanium.…”
Section: Preparation Before Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%