1980
DOI: 10.1016/0047-2352(80)90111-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time served and institutional misconduct: Patterns of involvement in disciplinary infractions among long-term and short-term inmates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
111
6
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
14
111
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The agency provided detailed behavioral histories along with individual specific data on all male inmates sentenced to state prisons between August 2004 and June 2006. Research indicates that misconduct is most likely to occur within the first three years of incarceration (Adams, 1992;Bottoms, 1999;Flanagan, 1980;Griffin & Hepburn, 2006;Zamble, 1992). Therefore, inmates who served a prison sentence of less than three years were removed from the sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agency provided detailed behavioral histories along with individual specific data on all male inmates sentenced to state prisons between August 2004 and June 2006. Research indicates that misconduct is most likely to occur within the first three years of incarceration (Adams, 1992;Bottoms, 1999;Flanagan, 1980;Griffin & Hepburn, 2006;Zamble, 1992). Therefore, inmates who served a prison sentence of less than three years were removed from the sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inmate misconduct rates, particularly for individuals with short sentences, fit an inverted U-shaped curve (Flanagan, 1980). Besides the passage of time, a number of other factors have been shown to correlate with misconduct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Most of these other factors are from cross-sectional research. Two of these factors are age and sentence length (Brown & Spevacek, 1971;Flanagan, 1980;Flanagan, 1983;Goetting & Howson, 1986;Myers & Levy, 1978). Being young and having a longer sentence are correlated with higher rates of misconduct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two individual-level variables most important to consider in the current context are sentence length and time served. Evidence concerning the extent and direction of the relationship between sentence length and violent misconduct has been mixed (Berk, Kriegler, & Baek, 2006;Cunningham & Sorensen, 2007a;Flanagan, 1980;Porporino, 1986). Time served by the beginning of the observation period was included to control for the stage of an inmate's confinement (Flanagan, 1980;Sorensen, Wrinkle, & Gutierrez, 1998;Thompson & Loper, 2005;Toch & Adams, 2002;Zamble, 1992).…”
Section: Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%