2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ncon.2015.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-lags in primate occupancy: a study case using dynamic models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Sales et al. () reported a time‐delayed response of 11 years for a primate species in Brazil. An exception is the work by Brooks et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Similarly, Sales et al. () reported a time‐delayed response of 11 years for a primate species in Brazil. An exception is the work by Brooks et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While habitat fragmentation may limit the dispersal capacity of A. caraya (Oklander, Kowalewski, & Corach, 2010;Oklander & Corach, 2013), a larger number of more closely-spaced patches may facilitate movements by providing stepping-stones of habitat (Clarke, Collins, & Zucker, 2002;Pozo-Montuy et al, 2011), especially considering the ability of the howlers to move over the ground (Serio-Silva, Ramírez-Julián, Eppley, & Chapman, 2019). It is important to note, however, that this apparent tolerance of habitat loss and fragmentation may actually represent the delayed or time-lagged extinction of populations (Michalski & Peres, 2005;Sales et al, 2015). While howler populations may persist in the short term, then, even in disturbed patches, both occupancy and overall density may decline over the medium to long term (Zunino, Kowalewski, Oklander, & González, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although little is known about the relationships established between these primates and the landscape and patch characteristics, we can propose a number of predictions on the characteristics of the behavioral ecology of these species. As a generalist species, the marmosets would be less sensitive to the landscape and local degradation and would not be affected by the anthropogenic matrix (Sales et al, 2015;Secco, Grilo, & Bager, 2018). As the capuchin monkeys live in large groups, they would need larger patches with a well-preserved structure (Fragaszy, Visalberghi, & Fedigan, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, human activities such as large enterprises pursuing economic development by mining, road construction, agriculture, and hydropower have converted large areas of continuous forest into forest mosaics with irregular sizes and shapes, inserted into a matrix of habitat usually unsuitable for biodiversity (Benchimol & Peres, 2015;Cochrane & Laurance, 2002;Ewers & Didham, 2007;Ferreira et al, 2014;. This recent transformation of natural landscapes can be the main cause of increasing species extinction rates even in protected areas ((PAs) (Benchimol & Peres, 2015;Henle et al, 1996)), although the extinction debt is poorly understood (Rangel, 2012) and the time lag of occupancy after a disturbance is also very unclear and poorly known (Metzger et al, 2009;Sales et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F. Laurance et al., 2002). This recent transformation of natural landscapes can be the main cause of increasing species extinction rates even in protected areas ((PAs) (Benchimol & Peres, 2015; Henle et al, 1996)), although the extinction debt is poorly understood (Rangel, 2012) and the time lag of occupancy after a disturbance is also very unclear and poorly known (Metzger et al., 2009; Sales et al., 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%