2001
DOI: 10.1108/02621710110365023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time in organizations

Abstract: Current organizational theory looks at time on task, as opposed to time off task. However, there is a more complex pattern of time use. Organization time, based on these findings, is defined as whether one engages with organization, or disengages from organization, and engages with task, or disengages from task. This article explores the theoretical implications of these complex relationships, as the locus of an individual’s use of time moves along the axes of engagement/disengagement from organization and tas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organizations' increasing complexity [20,21], professionalization [22], and globalization [23] make temporal reckonings acute, especially as they differ between and within societies and consequently in organizations [13,16,20]. As a result, several dichotomies of time have emerged in the organizational literature [24]. At the core of these dualisms is the distinction between an objective and subjective perception of time [25].…”
Section: Time In Mosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizations' increasing complexity [20,21], professionalization [22], and globalization [23] make temporal reckonings acute, especially as they differ between and within societies and consequently in organizations [13,16,20]. As a result, several dichotomies of time have emerged in the organizational literature [24]. At the core of these dualisms is the distinction between an objective and subjective perception of time [25].…”
Section: Time In Mosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Gersick's (1991) work shows "time" acts as a coordination mechanism for change, it creates a shared calendar for change and, thus, serves to schedule activities and to maximise their synchronisation. Time is a relevant consideration not only for activities that are readily observable and measurable, such as completing tasks, but also those that are not readily seen, such as thinking and reflecting on problems (Goddard, 2001).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, there are differences in the way that social status, the family situation and the type of professional activity they do interfere in the shortness and the degree of stratification of time for individuals. Goddard (2001) highlights the fact that, also in the sphere of management in organizations, the changes that have taken place in recent decades have required a reconfiguration of the notion of time. Traditionally, work was defined in terms of hours spent within organizational space on carrying out tasks.…”
Section: Modern Society Organizational Changes and Matters That Affementioning
confidence: 99%