2001
DOI: 10.2307/3560246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time: A New Research Lens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
458
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 418 publications
(477 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
458
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have argued that this situation has greatly hindered the progress of research in the field of work motivation, as well as in other areas of organisational behavior (cf. Ancona, Goodman & Tushman, 2001;Ancona, Okhuysen & Perlow, 2001;Dalal & Hulin, 2008;McGrath & Kelly, 1986;McGrath & Tschan, 2004;Mitchell & James, 2001;Mosakowski & Early, 2000;Roe, 2005a, 2005b, Steers, Mowday & Shapiro, 2004.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have argued that this situation has greatly hindered the progress of research in the field of work motivation, as well as in other areas of organisational behavior (cf. Ancona, Goodman & Tushman, 2001;Ancona, Okhuysen & Perlow, 2001;Dalal & Hulin, 2008;McGrath & Kelly, 1986;McGrath & Tschan, 2004;Mitchell & James, 2001;Mosakowski & Early, 2000;Roe, 2005a, 2005b, Steers, Mowday & Shapiro, 2004.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows the perception of time, its importance and management in organizational contexts (Palmer & Schoorman, 1999) that leads towards the experience of time pressure among employees (Major et al, 2002;Teuchmann et al, 1999;Jackson & Martin, 1996). In this regard many authors have discussed the need of time management for better incorporating time in theoretical models and research designs (Wright, 2002;Ancona et al, 2001;George & Jones, 2000;) as people can manage their time and improved their efforts (Macan, 1994) to make their working environment supportive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Further studies have noted that organizations often pursue both types of innovations. Scholars assume that effectively balancing both types of innovations can enhance dynamic capabilities and provide additional competitive advantage (Ancona, Goodman, Lawrence, & Tushman, 2001;Colbert, 2004). However, there are various organizational tensions (such as the "capabilityrigidity paradox") to finding an appropriate balance between different innovation objectives (Atuahene-Gima, 2005;Brown & Eisenhardt, 1997) and the interrelationships between internal and external knowledge sourcing processes (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990;Kogut & Zander, 1992;Lin, Yang, & Demirkan, 2007;Raisch et al, 2009).…”
Section: Inter-organizational Learning In Randd Alliancesmentioning
confidence: 99%