Through the magnifying glass: A descriptive theoretical analysis of the possible impact of the South African higher education policies on academic staff and their job satisfaction

Abstract

This article provides a descriptive theoretical analysis of the most important higher education policies and initiatives which were developed by the democratically elected government of South Africa after 1994 to transform the South African higher education system. The article sheds light on the rationale for the policies under scrutiny; how they take cognisance of academics' diverse needs; as well as how their implementation is bound to affect academics and possibly influence job satisfaction. The article argues that the South African higher education fraternity, currently overwhelmed by mammoth change initiatives, is simultaneously faced with two processes, namely transforming the socio-political state of the country, as well as transformation to respond to national higher education policy imperatives. Seemingly South African policy-makers, in their attempts to break away from the past, are oblivious of the realities of thorough policy implementation and do not take the voluminous nature of policies into consideration as an inhibiting factor. Undoubtedly this could have adverse effects for academic staff who are expected to propel change and transformation, but who are oftentimes confronted with the complexities of implementation which entail among others, dealing with cumbersome procedures, processes, bureaucratic structures as well as increasing workloads.

Influence of Academics’ Designation and Experience on their Job Satisfaction in Universities in Rift Valley Region of Kenya

“…To support this observation, Kipkebut (2010) argued that promotion for lecturers is dependent on teaching, research and publications but due to financial constraints, non-prioritisation of research by government and inadequate publishing facilities, publishing of refereed articles has become a monumental challenge in Kenya and among other African academics. Further, already concerns about academics not having sufficient time to publish and engage in research activities, aspects which are crucial for promotion and for building stature as an academic, loom in academic debates (Mapesela & Hay, 2005). …”

Determinants of Job Satisfaction in Academic Professionals of Pakistan

“…The impact of Higher Education Commission of Pakistan policies on academic staff and their satisfaction was found inconsistent (Mapesela & Hay, 2005). They found that most of the policies have negative correlation with academic staff performance and their job satisfaction.…”

Enhancing the Culture of Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Perspectives of Managing Institutional Accountability

“…Quality Agencies have produced generally acceptable norms of conduct usually expected of HEIs. The values, mission and aims of the institution should first be identified and established before an academic quality model can be developed (Mapesela & Hay, 2005). Social demand for HE has been on the increase over the past few decades.…”