2020
DOI: 10.1111/beer.12266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three types of organizational boundary spanning: Predicting CSR policy extensiveness among global consumer products companies

Abstract: As part of the rise of a worldwide corporate social responsibility (CSR) movement, companies have increasingly incorporated social and environmental concerns into their policies. This paper examines the extensiveness of these policies, proposing that an underappreciated contributor is the degree of organizational boundary spanning. The paper is novel in integrating multiple types of boundary spanning into a single empirical framework, including product, sub-unit, and national boundary spanning. The paper adds … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We combine data from “perhaps (the) oldest and best‐known CSR rating schemes in the US” (Lim & Pope, 2020, p. 456) to examine the irresponsible marketing behavior of firms and rivals, as described below, from the Kinder, Lydenberg, and Domini (KLD) Socrates/MSCI ESG database. This widely used CSR database (Chen, 2021; Hillman & Keim, 2001; Oikonomou et al, 2014; Surroca et al, 2010; Waddock & Graves, 1997), includes detailed, annual measures of positive and negative firm behaviors, categorized by stakeholder group (e.g., consumers, employees, etc.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We combine data from “perhaps (the) oldest and best‐known CSR rating schemes in the US” (Lim & Pope, 2020, p. 456) to examine the irresponsible marketing behavior of firms and rivals, as described below, from the Kinder, Lydenberg, and Domini (KLD) Socrates/MSCI ESG database. This widely used CSR database (Chen, 2021; Hillman & Keim, 2001; Oikonomou et al, 2014; Surroca et al, 2010; Waddock & Graves, 1997), includes detailed, annual measures of positive and negative firm behaviors, categorized by stakeholder group (e.g., consumers, employees, etc.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional theory is one (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983; Meyer & Rowan, 1977). It concerns the durable structures of organizational life, including the policies, practices, and initiatives by which the global CSR movement has spread (Kaplan & Kinderman, 2020; Lim & Pope, 2020; Strang & Meyer, 1993). Institutional theory suggests that organizations converge upon a similar set of structures to bolster their legitimacy in the eyes of their audiences (Etter et al, 2016).…”
Section: Core Concepts and Theoretical Underpinningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lim and Pope [6] suggest that the rise of the corporate social responsibility movement has increased company policies addressing social issues, mainly related to workers, human rights, supply chains, and the natural environment. Their study finds that firms crossing national borders for global markets incorporate social responsibility in their structure [6]. Yang and Zang [7] recognized that sustainability is a topic that must concern many organizations, especially the environmental dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%