2012
DOI: 10.1002/fld.3690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three‐dimensional wave impact on a rigid structure using smoothed particle hydrodynamics

Abstract: Reference #21: Rogers BD, Dalrymple RA, Stansby PK. Simulation of caisson breakwater movement using 2-d SPH.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples are the studies of Gómez-Gesteira and Dalrymple (2004) and Cummins et al (2012) who examined the impact of a single wave, originating from a dam-break, with a tall coastal structure. In both studies, the structure was a vertical rectangular column.…”
Section: ! !mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are the studies of Gómez-Gesteira and Dalrymple (2004) and Cummins et al (2012) who examined the impact of a single wave, originating from a dam-break, with a tall coastal structure. In both studies, the structure was a vertical rectangular column.…”
Section: ! !mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a real situation, the pressure acting on the structure at the time of initial impact is very high (Aureli, Dazzi, Maranzoni, Mignosa, & Vacondio, 2015;Cummins, Silvester, & Cleary, 2012;Kleefsman, Fekken, Veldman, Iwanowski, & Buchner, 2005). Common methods used in these three dimensional (3D) numerical models are based on Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations integrated by smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) Lagrangian methods (Barreiro, Crespo, Domínguez, & Gómez-Gesteira, 2013;Colagrossi & Landrini, 2003;Colagrossi, Lugni, & Brocchini, 2010;Cummins et al, 2012;Cuomo, Allsop, Bruce, & Pearson, 2010;Ferrari, Dumbser, Toro, & Armanini, 2009), Eulerian methods (Abdolmaleki, Thiagarajan, & Morris-Thomas, 2004;Kleefsman et al, 2005;Yang, Lin, Jiang, & Liu, 2010) or hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian methods (Raad & Bidoae, 2005). Two-dimensional models are not capable of accurately predicting the high-velocity dam break impact (Aureli et al, 2015) but low-velocity flow impacts (Aureli et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, we use the Level set method with a Eulerian formulation to calculate the reaction forces and pressures in a flash flood event. Moreover, the former simulation studies by Kleefsman et al (2005) and Cummins et al (2012) are more focused on water profiles, and in our study, we give our attention to impact pressures and forces with the flash flood structural damage scenario in mind. In addition, we take the material properties of the structure into consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later it has been extended to solve fluid-structure interaction problems including wave interactions with caisson breakwaters [13,14], with floating bodies [15][16][17][18] and with porous structures [19][20][21][22] as well as wave interactions with mound breakwater protected by armour blocks being discretized using SPH particles [23,24]. Nevertheless, the studies mentioned above have all focused on two dimensional applications of SPH and few researches are confronting 3D problems due to the high computational cost of 3D SPH models except some applications concerned with dam break [25][26][27] and wave breaking [23,28,29]. Constructing a numerical wave basin usually requests a large fluid domain to avoid wave reflections from the boundaries, which means that a 3D SPH simulation would typically contains millions of particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%