2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2016.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A SPH numerical wave basin for modeling wave-structure interactions

Abstract: . (2016). A SPH numerical wave basin for modeling wave-structure interactions. Applied Ocean Research, 59, 366-377. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2016 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prevent the undesirable wave reflection, a viscous damping zone is added at the downstream end of the numerical wave flume [70]. The damping zone has very high artificial viscosity and dissipates the kinetic energy of a fluid particle when it goes into this region.…”
Section: Wave Making and Wave Absorbtionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent the undesirable wave reflection, a viscous damping zone is added at the downstream end of the numerical wave flume [70]. The damping zone has very high artificial viscosity and dissipates the kinetic energy of a fluid particle when it goes into this region.…”
Section: Wave Making and Wave Absorbtionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study SPH 3D Mass-weighted damping zone 0.013-0.094, 0.160 Altomare et al [24] SPH 2D Active, passive absorber 0.010, 0.033 Wen et al [27] SPH-LES 3D sponge layer, periodic 0.049, 0.059 Altomare et al [32] SPH 2D damping zone 0.0108-0.0352 Didier and Neves [23] SPH 2D Active absorber 0.053 Zhang et al [33] Dynamic mesh 2D Boundary treatment 0.013-0.022 Dong and Huang [34] Finite-analytic 2D Boundary layer 0.0042-0.011 Wu et al [35] MFS 2D Damping zone 0.0409-0.0488 Tian et al [2] CFD 3D Damping zone, outlet 0.032-0.057 Machado et al [31] CFD 2D Beach, outlet 0.02 Prasad et al [29] CFD 2D Free slip, no-slip 0.042 Anbarsooz et al [36] CFD 2D Damping zone 0.0094-0.0488…”
Section: Dimensions Boundary Conditions Wave Steepnessmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Inflow and outflow regions were used by imposing the velocity and pressure to boundaries, and the numerical wave is damped using an artificial viscosity equation. Wen et al [27] simulated three-dimensional wave interaction with coastal structures by using a parallelized weakly compressible SPH code, and the sponge layer and active absorbing wavemaker were introduced to ensure accuracy in the simulation. Domínguez et al [28] applied SPH to simulate the interaction of sea waves with floating structures by coupling an open-source code DualSPHysics with a lumped-mass mooring dynamics mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed model was applied to the Vortex-Induced Vibration (VIV) of a circular cylinder in laminar cross-flow. By adopting a parallel SPH model, Wen et al (2016) proposed 3D numerical wave basin to study the wave impact on a vertical cylinder. Their OpenMP programming technology, combined with an existing MPI program contained in the parallel version of SPHysics code, was implemented to enable the simulation of several hundred million particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%