2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
163
1
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
12
163
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…They have been successfully applied in for biological applications to model implants for various human joints 17) . In the dental fi eld, models have been used to determine stresses in diff erent biological structures, such as TMJ implants, facial Times (s) Figure 9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been successfully applied in for biological applications to model implants for various human joints 17) . In the dental fi eld, models have been used to determine stresses in diff erent biological structures, such as TMJ implants, facial Times (s) Figure 9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feldspathic porcelain (Ceramco II, Dentsply, Burlington, NJ) was used for the occlusal surfaces. Table 1 lists the Young's modules and Poisson ratios of cortical bone (D2), [22] spongious bone (D4), [22] titanium (implant body C abutment), [22] zirconia, [10] porcelain [23] and cement. [24] The vertical and oblique (30 to the vertical) load applied in the model was 200 N, based on the literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a 3D FE analysis technique, Sevimay et al [23] investigated the effects of bone quality on the stress distribution in an implant and implant-supported crown. They showed the presence of lower stresses with D1 and D2 bone qualities and increased stresses for D3 and D4 bone qualities because trabecular bone was weaker and less resistant to deformation.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 However, there are a number of factors that can cause failure of implant treatments, such as surgical and/or systemic complications, in addition to poor bone quality and density that may compromise the initial stability of the implant, which is a prerequisite for the success of osseointegration. 3,4 The forces that occur at the implant-bone interface can promote micromovements in the implant and are the most damaging ones in the first moments of implant healing. 5 Furthermore, the primary stability of the implant also depends on the quality, density, and thickness of available cortical bone tissue at the surgical site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%