2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.11.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thoracolumbar spine loading associated with kinematics of the young and the elderly during activities of daily living

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, age differences between our patient subjects and healthy controls could confound our analyses. However, one study found loads on the lower lumbar spine during STS to be similar between relatively younger and older individuals provided both were asymptomatic [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, age differences between our patient subjects and healthy controls could confound our analyses. However, one study found loads on the lower lumbar spine during STS to be similar between relatively younger and older individuals provided both were asymptomatic [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the lifting activity, we additionally applied a quintic polynomial function to all sagittal plane spinal marker trajectories (i.e. C7 to S1) to derive segmental angles (angles between the normal lines passing through the individual marker positions) of the L1/L2, L2/L3, L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1 spinal units [23,24]. Information on maker placement accuracy and soft tissue artifacts can be found elsewhere [52,67].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…study, in several cases these load levels yielded high creep and elastic deformations (>5% strain), which was attributed to pre-existing damage. Despite being in line with theoretical estimates of load levels encountered during physiological tasks (Ignasiak et al, 2017; Iyer et al, 2010), this load level was too high for the lowest density specimens. The current findings are expected to help inform loading protocols for future creep studies of vertebral bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The vertebra-endcap construct was constrained in metal platens. The specimens were loaded to 1000 N in uniaxial compression (Point A, Figure 3) in order to apply a physiologic load level representative of that experienced during standing (Ignasiak et al, 2017; Iyer et al, 2010; Pollintine et al, 2009; Sato et al, 1999) and kept at that level for 2 hours. After 2 hours (Point C, Figure 3), specimens were unloaded to a finite minimum load of 100 N and displacement was recorded during recovery for another 2 hours.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%