2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness uniformity and surface morphology of Fe, Ti, and Hf films produced by filtered pulsed cathodic arc deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the typically used optical methods are only suitable for transparent or translucent films [13], while the stylus methods (viz. AFM or profilometer) can only give the surface topography of the films [14]. And the electrons method cannot give accurate measuring results which is limited by the statistical fluctuation of the beam intensity [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the typically used optical methods are only suitable for transparent or translucent films [13], while the stylus methods (viz. AFM or profilometer) can only give the surface topography of the films [14]. And the electrons method cannot give accurate measuring results which is limited by the statistical fluctuation of the beam intensity [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sheet resistance uniformity of thin films deposited on TCO substrates is one of the key successful parameters of the film quality. Previous studies examined ways of achieving a high uniformity of deposit using a range of different deposition techniques, such as pulse laser deposition [ 3 ], chemical beam coating [ 4 ], vacuum arc deposition [ 5 ], and plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. In addition, some studies also simulated the uniformity models of the deposit through a Monte Carlo simulation [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%