2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.101.224429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of interacting magnetic nanoparticles

Abstract: We apply the concepts of stochastic thermodynamics combined with the transition state theory to develop a framework for evaluating local heat distributions across the assemblies of interacting magnetic nanoparticles (MP) subject to time-varying external magnetic fields. We show that additivity of entropy production in the particle state-space allows separating the entropy contributions and evaluating the heat produced by the individual MPs despite interactions. Using MP chains as a model system for convenience… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(76 reference statements)
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another key aspect defining the heating performance is the particle assembling, as it is often observed that particles tend to aggregate after cell internalisation, 41 which may completely define their heat release in comparison with the randomly dispersed case. [42][43][44][45] The assembling process is defined by a complex interplay between a broad range of parameters, including the media properties (viscosity, pH), the nanoparticle characteristics (size, shape, anisotropy), the field parameters (frequency and amplitude) and, obviously, the sample concentration see e.g. Bakuzis et al and references therein.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another key aspect defining the heating performance is the particle assembling, as it is often observed that particles tend to aggregate after cell internalisation, 41 which may completely define their heat release in comparison with the randomly dispersed case. [42][43][44][45] The assembling process is defined by a complex interplay between a broad range of parameters, including the media properties (viscosity, pH), the nanoparticle characteristics (size, shape, anisotropy), the field parameters (frequency and amplitude) and, obviously, the sample concentration see e.g. Bakuzis et al and references therein.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used to evaluate the hysteresis loops of ensembles, including kinetic Monte Carlo techniques 16,17 and an equivalent Master equation model, 18,19 which are suitable for the typical timescales of magnetic hyperthermia experiments (tens to hundreds of kHz). These approaches require an evaluation of reversal probabilities to traverse over energy barriers, which is not a trivial task in the presence of magnetic interactions even between just two particles 20 and involves various approximations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,22 This approach, however, is not correct due to the fact that an individual nanoparticle does not form an isolated system and does work on its interacting counterpart. Our recent consideration of the thermodynamics of interacting nanoparticles 19 showed that also within a statistical approach -rather than a dynamical approach as described here -one can not evaluate released heat from individual particle hysteresis loops and an explicit evaluation of entropy production is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the assembling of the nanocubes in a chainlike fashion increases the correlation length, thus modifying the response to external stimuli [8,10,54]. This effect stems from the dependence of the entropy and dipolar interactions on the length of the chain, although the particular details will depend also on the chain orientation with respect to the field direction [52]. For instance, monodisperse iron-oxide NPs of 44 nm in size, assembled into chains, have achieved a heating performance of around 2 kW per Fe gram (1.5 kW/g nanoparticle) under a 24 kA/m and 765 kHz, while the same nonassembled control samples show typical iron-oxide SLP values below 500 W/g [14].…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%