1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-4105(98)00024-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic investigation of surface of minerals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of nonpolar liquids, values of k obtained for several aluminosilicates are about 2.6 ± 0.2 (22,23,30). Combining Eqs.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of nonpolar liquids, values of k obtained for several aluminosilicates are about 2.6 ± 0.2 (22,23,30). Combining Eqs.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The second difficulty lies in the actual thermodynamic sense of γ LW . It has been shown (22,24,30) that, in the model of van Oss-Chaudhury-Good (31)(32)(33), this term characterizes a solid-vapor surface at equilibrium at ambient temperature and pressure. This means that it is a physical state where vapor is adsorbed.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Young equation was used to calculate γ s , the surface tension of the liquid (γ L ) and the solid/liquid contact angle (θ). The surface energy values determined in water were 205.06 ± 2.76 mJ.m -2 for montmorillonite (swelling clay), 151.80 ± 34.98 mJ.m -2 for bentonite [15], and 59.00 mJ.m -2 for kaolinite [16]. The zeta potential as function of pH can also be used to assess the surface properties of clay minerals such as kaolinite [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%