2000
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.6984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Experimental Way of Measuring the Hamaker Constant A11 of Divided Solids by Immersion Calorimetry in Apolar Liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hamaker constant represents the strength of the Van der Waals interactions between the macroscopic bodies; therefore, for a soil in water it changes mostly depending on the type of minerals in the soil's composition. Medout-Marere (2000) found the value of the Hamaker constant for montmorillonite A = -7.8 Á 10 -20 J, while Mitchell and Soga (2005) suggested the value A = -2.2 Á 10 -20 J. In calculating the w À w m relationship for the tested Ca-montmorillonite (sample 1) the best fitting values compared to the measured were achieved using A = -7.8 Á 10 -20 J.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Hamaker constant represents the strength of the Van der Waals interactions between the macroscopic bodies; therefore, for a soil in water it changes mostly depending on the type of minerals in the soil's composition. Medout-Marere (2000) found the value of the Hamaker constant for montmorillonite A = -7.8 Á 10 -20 J, while Mitchell and Soga (2005) suggested the value A = -2.2 Á 10 -20 J. In calculating the w À w m relationship for the tested Ca-montmorillonite (sample 1) the best fitting values compared to the measured were achieved using A = -7.8 Á 10 -20 J.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because of the presence of Ca-montmorillonite in the sample, the calculated water content was increased for an appropriate portion of the interlayer water w ai & 11.9 %. The Hamaker constant for kaolinite in water quoted by Medout-Marere (2000) and Mitchell and Soga (2005) is A = -6.8 Á 10 -20 J or A = -3.1 Á 10 -20 J. Sample 3 (grey clay) contains mostly illite and quartz.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, literature data for A 11 for water (3.7-5.8 × 10 −21 J), acetonitrile (2.4-4.0 × 10 −21 J) silica (5.6-8.4 × 10 −21 J), and polymers of different nature (4.4-9.0 × 10 −21 J) allow to calculate the interaction constants A 123 for the triads of solute-solvent-solid here studied using Eq. (T2-4), and the ranges of values obtained for each triad contains the A 0 value calculated by fitting f vs. data in each case (Fernandez-Varea and Garcia-Molina, 2000;Medout-Marere, 2000;Blomberg et al, 1998;Bergström, 1997). It can be seen that there is a considerable divergence in the measured value of A 11 , being this divergence considerably greater when solvents such as water are used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It can be defined as the force required to pull two particles apart. The intermolecular interaction energy is considered as the sum of two contributions [46]: one is due to the electromagnetic effects of electron clouds and leads to van der Waals interactions, the other is due to the surface charge effects and leads to electrostatic interactions. These two contributions are additive.…”
Section: Estimation Of Energy and Forces Between The Platelets In A Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medout-Marere [46] measured values of the Hamaker constant for different materials by immersion calorimetry in apolar liquids. The Hamaker constant for Montmorillonite is given as 7.8 3 10 220 J.…”
Section: Estimation Of Energy and Forces Between The Platelets In A Cmentioning
confidence: 99%