2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal treatments and transformation behavior of Cu–Al–Be shape memory alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stabilization of martensite basically refers to a condition in which the martensite phase becomes more stable than the austenite parent phase under specific thermo‐mechanical conditions, and manifests itself through an increase of the reverse transformation temperature or a decrease of the critical stress at which the reverse transformation takes place. From early works, the origin of the stabilization was linked to quenching and thermal aging through diffusion processes, and due to the importance from both fundamental and practical points of view, particularly in Cu‐based SMA, the stabilization of martensite was the subject of many research works, most of them dealing with the stabilization during thermal treatments, although the stabilization of the martensite as a consequence of a mechanical action was also reported . Thermal stabilization was attributed in the literature to mechanisms such as reordering at the martensite interfaces, atomic ordering of the phases after quenching, and migration of quenched vacancies over the interfaces of martensite, depending of the alloy and the thermal treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stabilization of martensite basically refers to a condition in which the martensite phase becomes more stable than the austenite parent phase under specific thermo‐mechanical conditions, and manifests itself through an increase of the reverse transformation temperature or a decrease of the critical stress at which the reverse transformation takes place. From early works, the origin of the stabilization was linked to quenching and thermal aging through diffusion processes, and due to the importance from both fundamental and practical points of view, particularly in Cu‐based SMA, the stabilization of martensite was the subject of many research works, most of them dealing with the stabilization during thermal treatments, although the stabilization of the martensite as a consequence of a mechanical action was also reported . Thermal stabilization was attributed in the literature to mechanisms such as reordering at the martensite interfaces, atomic ordering of the phases after quenching, and migration of quenched vacancies over the interfaces of martensite, depending of the alloy and the thermal treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From early works, the origin of the stabilization was linked to quenching and thermal aging through diffusion processes, and due to the importance from both fundamental and practical points of view, particularly in Cu‐based SMA, the stabilization of martensite was the subject of many research works, most of them dealing with the stabilization during thermal treatments, although the stabilization of the martensite as a consequence of a mechanical action was also reported . Thermal stabilization was attributed in the literature to mechanisms such as reordering at the martensite interfaces, atomic ordering of the phases after quenching, and migration of quenched vacancies over the interfaces of martensite, depending of the alloy and the thermal treatment. However, although the mentioned mechanisms are the most common origin of thermal stabilization, in the present study the samples remain some years at room temperature after quenching, the nano‐compression tests were conducted also at room temperature and consequently the fast stabilization process observed during the anomalous behavior in Figures and can not be explained through diffusion processes, and kinetic stabilization or a sweeping‐up mechanism, cannot be invoked to stabilize the martensite interfaces in our case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40] The chemical composition Cu-12Al-0.47Be (wt%) was chosen in order to conduct the superelastic tests at room temperature, [24] and indeed the transformation temperatures measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were M s = 247 K, M f = 194 K, A s = 233 K, A f = 263 K (martensite start and finish, and austenite start and finish, respectively). Then, the samples were annealed at 1023 K in Ar during 1800 s and quenched in boiling water at 373 K to freeze the metastable austenitic phase at room temperature and to avoid further evolution of the transformation temperatures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main Cu-based SMAs are derived from the copper-aluminium (Cu-Al) binary system, in which the stabilization of β-phase at lower temperatures is crucial to improve their thermomechanical properties. The β-phase stabilization is achieved through heat treatments and the addition of an element such as manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni) and beryllium (Be) have been used [17]. The addition of small amounts of Be cause to a sharp decrease in the martensitic transformation temperature in Cu-Al alloys close to the eutectoid composition [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%