2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.04.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal oxidation temperature dependence of 4H-SiC MOS interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[6][7][8][9][10] Recent reports on high-temperature oxidation of 4H-SiC have shown that this process could be beneficial for the 4H-SiC/SiO 2 interface. [11][12][13][14] It has been reported 12 that as-grown 4H-SiC oxidized at 1500°C resulted in a 4H-SiC MOSFET with maximum field-effect mobility of 40 cm 2 /V s; here we investigate a similar effect for the 3C-SiC/SiO 2 interface. In this study, the highest temperature used for oxidation of 3C-SiC was 1400°C, because of the limit imposed by the melting point of Si (1414°C).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…[6][7][8][9][10] Recent reports on high-temperature oxidation of 4H-SiC have shown that this process could be beneficial for the 4H-SiC/SiO 2 interface. [11][12][13][14] It has been reported 12 that as-grown 4H-SiC oxidized at 1500°C resulted in a 4H-SiC MOSFET with maximum field-effect mobility of 40 cm 2 /V s; here we investigate a similar effect for the 3C-SiC/SiO 2 interface. In this study, the highest temperature used for oxidation of 3C-SiC was 1400°C, because of the limit imposed by the melting point of Si (1414°C).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The peak can be deconvoluted with at least two peaks centered at 99.5 and 101.3 eV as shown by the red dashed curves. It has been reported that the Si 2p peak for pure Si is at 99.5 eV [31] and that the chemical shifts due to SiC [32], SiS 2 [33], and SiO 2 [34] formations are +0.9, +3.9, and +3.9 eV, respectively. In the present experiment, the chemical shift due to SiO x formation seems to be almost negligible because, according to the FTIR results, the particles have few Si-O bonds (A small shoulder between 103 and 104 eV in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we can see, this surface is virtually different from the virgin C-face 4H-SiC substrate [22]. It could be due to non-etchable nano-islands of C related compound structures such as ␣-CH or SiO x C y clusters [30]. The former is highly chemical resistant to HF, which has been used as a mask to etch SiO 2 layers [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%