1987
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.36.1896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal-neutron fission cross section of 26.1-min235Um

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But in some situations, excited states need to be considered and the population of these excited states leads to other reaction channels that can change system behavior. In the case of 235 U, the fission cross section for the first excited state, the 26 minutes isomer, exceeds that of the ground state fission cross section by a factor ~2 at thermal neutron energies [1]. At higher energies (up to ~300 keV) calculations predict the fission cross section for the isomer to be 20-50% smaller than that of the ground state [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…But in some situations, excited states need to be considered and the population of these excited states leads to other reaction channels that can change system behavior. In the case of 235 U, the fission cross section for the first excited state, the 26 minutes isomer, exceeds that of the ground state fission cross section by a factor ~2 at thermal neutron energies [1]. At higher energies (up to ~300 keV) calculations predict the fission cross section for the isomer to be 20-50% smaller than that of the ground state [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An interesting example of a short-lived isomer is the first isomer of uranium 235 with a half-life of 26 min. Until now, only the ratio of the isomer fission cross section to the ground-state fission cross section for thermal and cold neutron energies has been measured [2,3]. In the laboratory, this isomer can be produced from the alpha-decay of 239 Pu with an equilibrium ratio being 2x10 -9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One possible approach would be to chemically purify the plutonium, removing the uranium that has built up, and then repurify, extracting the newly created isomer perhaps 10 minutes later. This is a formidable problem in radiochemistry but has been solved on a small scale [6]. The first purification must completely extract all the uranium, which will have been in the ground state (the tolerable fraction of the uranium remaining is less than the ratio of the isomeric half life to the time since fabrication of the sample, or < 0.0006 for a month-old sample), and the second purification, taking no longer than about 10 minutes, must extract 2 ppb of newly produced (isomeric) uranium from plutonium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first purification must completely extract all the uranium, which will have been in the ground state (the tolerable fraction of the uranium remaining is less than the ratio of the isomeric half life to the time since fabrication of the sample, or < 0.0006 for a month-old sample), and the second purification, taking no longer than about 10 minutes, must extract 2 ppb of newly produced (isomeric) uranium from plutonium. We estimate in Section 5 that to measure the cross-section at MeV energies will require isolation of about 100 times as many isomeric nuclei as achieved by [6] for their measurements at thermal energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation