2017
DOI: 10.1257/app.20160247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There Will Be Killing: Collectivization and Death of Draft Animals

Abstract: The elimination of private property rights can lead to ineffcient use of productive assets. In China's collectivization movement from 1955 to 1957, instead of transferring draft animals to the ownership of the collectives, peasants slaughtered them to keep the meat and hide. By comparing 1,600 counties that launched the movement in different years, the difference-in-differences estimates suggest that the animal loss during the movement was 12 to 15 percent, or 7.4–9.5 million head. Grain output dropped by 7 pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is unlikely not only because of the evidence we present in Section 4, but also due to the collectivization movement in 1952-1957 that completely eliminated private property rights (both usage and transfer rights) to any land and production assets soon after the Land Reform. To the extent that one could try to hide wealth and assets from being confiscated, it is primarily in the form of slaughtering cattle for one-off private consumption, and the estimated scale of such a behavior is rather low (Chen and Lan, 2017). A more plausible channel of avoiding confiscation during the two Revolutions was to transfer wealth overseas, mainly to Hong Kong and Taiwan.…”
Section: Alternative Channels Of Persistencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is unlikely not only because of the evidence we present in Section 4, but also due to the collectivization movement in 1952-1957 that completely eliminated private property rights (both usage and transfer rights) to any land and production assets soon after the Land Reform. To the extent that one could try to hide wealth and assets from being confiscated, it is primarily in the form of slaughtering cattle for one-off private consumption, and the estimated scale of such a behavior is rather low (Chen and Lan, 2017). A more plausible channel of avoiding confiscation during the two Revolutions was to transfer wealth overseas, mainly to Hong Kong and Taiwan.…”
Section: Alternative Channels Of Persistencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "community farm" has various meanings depending on different times and regions. In former communist countries, communal (collective) farms were forced to form under the leadership of the central government [9,10], which is quite different from what we target. Our target is a farm that is jointly managed as a democratic economic entity by farmers within a community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…These observations do not square with the view that an unchecked state was the Achilles' heel that hindered economic development in imperial China. This is not to say that an unchecked state is innocuous and indeed, there are grounds to be concerned about the dangers posed by a strengthened Chinese state with weak internal checks and balances, as the madness of the Great Leap Forward (1958)(1959)(1960)(1961)(1962) attests (Chen & Lan, 2016;Kung & Chen, 2011;Li & Yang, 2005;Meng et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%