2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.0952-1909.2003.00220.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There were States in Medieval Europe: A Response to Rees Davies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other scholars have sought to adapt definitions of the state as an Idealtypus to medieval societies. Reynolds built upon Weber to define the medieval state as ‘an organization of human society within a more or less fixed area in which the ruler or governing body more or less successfully control[led] the legitimate use of physical force’ (Reynolds, 2003, p. 551) 20. This definition is rather a question about the extent to which medieval polities were similar to their modern counterparts, and thus runs into the trap of teleology and contradistinction that we have previously noted.…”
Section: Early Medieval Polities and The State: A Historiographical R...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other scholars have sought to adapt definitions of the state as an Idealtypus to medieval societies. Reynolds built upon Weber to define the medieval state as ‘an organization of human society within a more or less fixed area in which the ruler or governing body more or less successfully control[led] the legitimate use of physical force’ (Reynolds, 2003, p. 551) 20. This definition is rather a question about the extent to which medieval polities were similar to their modern counterparts, and thus runs into the trap of teleology and contradistinction that we have previously noted.…”
Section: Early Medieval Polities and The State: A Historiographical R...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the concept of the state for the study of medieval societies is highly disputed 1 . Twenty years ago, the Journal of Historical Sociology hosted an exchange between S. Reynolds (2003) and R.R. Davies (2003) that captured the essence of the debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the discussions of state formation inevitably draw on the history of political assembly‐making. Adopting Max Weber's definition of the modern state as a ‘community that successfully claims the monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory’, historians and political scientists have assessed the applicability of the ‘state’ label to various types of political configuration going as far back as the Neolithic Revolution (Davies, 2003; versus Reynolds, 2003; Scott, 2018). As is apparent from major titles such as Joseph Strayer's On the Medieval Origins of the Modern State (1970) or Perry Anderson's Lineages of the Absolutist State (1974), the goal is to explain the long‐term trajectory that led to the emergence of what has become the dominant form of political organization since around 1800.…”
Section: History Of State Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%