Theory-Based Stakeholder Evaluation

Abstract

This article introduces a new approach to program theory evaluation called theory-based stakeholder evaluation or the TSE model for short. Most theory-based approaches are program theory driven and some are stakeholder oriented as well. Practically, all of the latter fuse the program perceptions of the various stakeholder groups into one unitary program theory. The TSE model keeps the program theories of the diverse stakeholder groups apart from each other and from the program theory embedded in the institutionalized intervention itself. This represents, the authors argue, an important clarification and extension of the standard theory-based evaluation. The TSE model is elaborated to enhance theory-based evaluation of interventions characterized by conflicts and competing program theories. The authors argue that especially in evaluations of complex and complicated multilevel and multisite interventions, the presence of competing theories is likely and the TSE model may prove useful.

Inappropriate admissions or inadequate discharges of frail elderly: Competing program theories and implementation challenges in an intermediate care intervention

“…The data were subsequently structured according to the analysis tools: a) application of a principle of reason; b) theories structured in a tripartite scheme, and c) raw theories organized according to the extended system model (input-conversion-outputoutcome). [17] To enhance the rigour of the process and findings we thoroughly followed the methodical steps recommend by Hansen and Vedung [17] and the standards for reporting qualitative research (SRQR) summarized by O'Brien et al [19] The programme theory evaluation was approved by the project leaders, the hospital managers and the four chief executives from the included municipalities. No further formal approval is required by Danish legislation.…”

“…[17] The framework describes the stakeholders' programme theory for the specific intervention including their 1) situation theory; 2) normative theory and 3) causal theory. Situation theory refers to the stakeholders' notions of the contexts without or before the intervention, including their thinking on the relevance of any invention.…”

Eight attention points when evaluating large-scale public-sector reforms

“…The process evaluations thus provide credible suggestions for the processes that can explain the results of the effect evaluations. Furthermore, various recent trends within evaluation theory (Chen, 2014;Hansen & Vedung, 2010;Pawson, 2013) indicate that mapping of the links between cause and effect in process evaluations are often decisive for being able to determine whether effects that are identified in measurements of effect are the result of the reform or of other circumstances -and even more importantly, what characteristics of the reform and its context have brought about the effects.…”

Is spatial planning a collaborative learning process? A case study from a rural–urban gradient in Sweden

“…(3) sufficient planning capacity of organisations and institutions responsible for development, preparation and delivery of strategic spatial plans (Sabatier, 1986;Lundquist, 1987); (4) a confluence of views as regards desirable solutions in strategic territorial development Walker, 1996, 2001;Faludi, 2000;Albrechts, 2004); (5) collaborative assessment and adaptation of strategic spatial plans (Svensson et al, 2009;Hansen and Vedung, 2010;Alterman, 1988;Pretty and Scoones, 1995;Brulin and Svensson, 2011); (6) implementation of the plan (Midgely, 2000;Vedung, 2008;Donaldson, 2007;Donaldson et al, 2009); and (7) collaborative assessment of plan outcomes (Vedung, 2008;Donaldson, 2007;Donaldson et al, 2009;Clark, 2002).…”