2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is spatial planning a collaborative learning process? A case study from a rural–urban gradient in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
40
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Aside from making hypothesised system structures explicit, potential uses include structuring of problem spaces, identification of research questions, identification of areas of risk and uncertainty, and the development of shared learning and collaboration [15]. Applications of qualitative system dynamics and CLDs are found in a diverse number of areas, where examples specifically related to the sustainability field include ecological economics [16,17], environmental management and governance [18,19], community development [20], and stakeholder participation in environmental decision making [21].…”
Section: Tools For Systems Analysis: System Dynamics Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from making hypothesised system structures explicit, potential uses include structuring of problem spaces, identification of research questions, identification of areas of risk and uncertainty, and the development of shared learning and collaboration [15]. Applications of qualitative system dynamics and CLDs are found in a diverse number of areas, where examples specifically related to the sustainability field include ecological economics [16,17], environmental management and governance [18,19], community development [20], and stakeholder participation in environmental decision making [21].…”
Section: Tools For Systems Analysis: System Dynamics Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of MCP as strategic spatial planning will, potentially, increase in the light of new policies linked to climate change and the ongoing unsustainable use of natural resources (Elbakidze et al, 2015;European Commission, 2013;Storbjörk & Uggla, 2015), and will facilitate the integration of local, regional and national sustainability issues. The original purpose of MCP was to decentralize planning and increase its relevancy to local conditions and residents, to produce greater legitimacy of planning and decisions (Larsson, 2011;Prop., /1986Prop., :3, 1985Prop., /1986.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fredriksson, 2011;Malbert, 1998;Sandström, 2002). Furthermore, research has predominantly focused on areas such as specific aspects of the plan or the planning process, for example, how sustainability is handled in MCP (Åkerskog, 2009;Andersson et al, 2013;Guinchard, & Cars, 1997;Nilsson & Iversen, 2015;Persson, 2013), on different attachment MCPs such as wind power, rural development in shoreline areas and in-depth plans for towns and larger villages/districts (Gullstrand, Löwgren, & Castensson, 2003;Kalbro, Lindgren, & Paulsson, 2012;Khan, 2003;Söderholm, Ek, & Pettersson, 2007;Söderholm & Pettersson, 2011), on public participation (Henecke & Khan, 2002;Johansson, 2001;Malbert, 1998;Morf, 2005) and on MCP as a learning process (Elbakidze et al, 2015). Studies on how legal requirements for MCP are handled in practice are rare and mainly found in undergraduate theses and similar studies (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some authors have been debating the linkage between neoliberal urban planning policies and strategic spatial planning in relation to growing socio-spatial inequalities, a lack of affordable housing [80], and transboundary environmental threats [81]. In spite of critics who argued that strategic spatial planning had become increasingly co-opted into the dominant neo-liberal discourse, only a few examples of strategic spatial plans concerned with societal progress, equal living conditions, and a good and lasting sustainable environment for the benefit of people could be identified [82]. Not until the literature published in 2017 did we find evidence of the phenomena of land degradation being debated in strategic spatial planning literature, despite academic and policy-oriented documents suggesting a dramatic intensification of land degradation owing to weakly-planned urban and infrastructure developments [3,4,21,22].…”
Section: Key Phenomena Of Land Degradation Addressed In Strategic Spamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, environmental concerns, as well as aspects of nature protection and measures intended to control urbanization, have been preoccupations of those involved in strategic spatial planning research and practice [82,84,85]. Table 1 provides a summary of the findings.…”
Section: Key Phenomena Of Land Degradation Addressed In Strategic Spamentioning
confidence: 99%