1996
DOI: 10.2307/3178416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theorizing Difference from Multiracial Feminism

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
192
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 447 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
192
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, the contemporary versions of the term emerged from the feminist movement of the 1960s and 1970s in the United States where women of color found themselves among the most vocal constituents of the women's movement, but were locked out of the mainstream voice of the feminist movement and at odds with other feminists (Landry 2006;Weber 1998;Hill Collins 1991;hooks 1984). In the mid-1980s and early 1990s, serious discussion and writing began to emerge on "multiracial feminism" which lamented the "interlocking" and "interconnected" forms of discrimination that not only shaped the consciousness of women of color separate and apart from white women and black men, but rendered them invisible in political struggles for equality by each group (Zinn and Dill 1996;Naples 1998). The terms "interlocking," "intertwined," and "interdependent" were used interchangeably in scholarly literature but the term "intersection" has had more caché and is more commonly used in the literature as a proxy for these concepts.…”
Section: The Early Writings: Theoretical and Historical Origins Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More specifically, the contemporary versions of the term emerged from the feminist movement of the 1960s and 1970s in the United States where women of color found themselves among the most vocal constituents of the women's movement, but were locked out of the mainstream voice of the feminist movement and at odds with other feminists (Landry 2006;Weber 1998;Hill Collins 1991;hooks 1984). In the mid-1980s and early 1990s, serious discussion and writing began to emerge on "multiracial feminism" which lamented the "interlocking" and "interconnected" forms of discrimination that not only shaped the consciousness of women of color separate and apart from white women and black men, but rendered them invisible in political struggles for equality by each group (Zinn and Dill 1996;Naples 1998). The terms "interlocking," "intertwined," and "interdependent" were used interchangeably in scholarly literature but the term "intersection" has had more caché and is more commonly used in the literature as a proxy for these concepts.…”
Section: The Early Writings: Theoretical and Historical Origins Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its most basic form, intersectionality contends that the distinguishing categories within a society, such as race/ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation, class, and other markers of identity and difference, do not function independently but, rather, act in tandem as interlocking or intersectional phenomena (Zinn and Dill 1996;Crenshaw Williams 1995;Brewer 1993;Hill Collins 1993;King 1988). George (2001) describes intersectionality and its analytical contribution in this way; "Intersectionality goes beyond just looking at the gender aspects of racial discrimination.…”
Section: What Do We Mean When We Say "Intersectionality"?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these conflicts arose directly out of the exclusionary identity politics of the 80's and 90's, continued intellectual engagement with other forms of feminism and critical social theory have blurred these ideological and political boundaries. In particular, critiques by transnational, lesbian, and indigenous feminists argue that discussions of gender and sexuality fail to consider the articulation of other forms of oppression, like race, ethnicity, and class (Anzaldú a 1991; Barnard 1999;Hammonds 1997;Harding 1991;Moraga 1996;Nagel 2000;Namaste 1996;Zinn and Dill 1996). This work reframes discussion of gender and sexuality in terms of intersectionality: ''the complex interaction between a range of discourses, institutions, identities, and forms of exploitation that structure subjectivities (and the relations between them) in elaborate, heterogeneous, and often contradictory ways'' (Sullivan 2003:72).…”
Section: Queer Theory and Feminist Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is problematic for WAD theorists who align themselves with a culturally situated ontology and consider the individual as an expression of its society. Zinn provides the example that one is not just a woman fighting oppression, but an African women fighting oppression, as such, one cannot understand the particular woman unless one understand the sense in which she is 'African', and further, one cannot understand the problem unless one understands the significance of 'Africa' itself (Zinn 1996).…”
Section: The Situated Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, WAD theorists consider and this thesis questions, whether an international development agenda based on a political theory which does not provide an entry point for this ontological interpretation provides no basis for 'developing world' people to be recognized appropriately as a subject, voice or knowledge base, in the discourse concerning them, such that their understandings of what constitutes gender roles, representation, and forms of oppression can be appropriately registered by that discourse (Zinn 1996). Chapter Five engages with this hypothesis and examines the situated nature of gender relations in the South Gobi and the Mongolian context.…”
Section: The Situated Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%