2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2007.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical study of structural and electronic properties of oligo(thiophene-phenylene)s in comparison with oligothiophenes and oligophenylenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the bridged or unbridged mono or heterocyclic polymers, comparisons between the theoretical and the experimental results are available in the literature. Previously published results show that while the computed energy gaps differ in the range of 4-5 eV for dimers and 2.5-3.5 eV for hexamers, the experimental gaps were found to be in between 2.0-3.0 eV for polymers [34][35][36][37][38][39]. When those published data and our results have been compared, we may conclude that our title polymer is expected to have larger energy gap with respect to bridged or unbridged mono or heterocyclic polymers.…”
Section: Theoretical Electronic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For the bridged or unbridged mono or heterocyclic polymers, comparisons between the theoretical and the experimental results are available in the literature. Previously published results show that while the computed energy gaps differ in the range of 4-5 eV for dimers and 2.5-3.5 eV for hexamers, the experimental gaps were found to be in between 2.0-3.0 eV for polymers [34][35][36][37][38][39]. When those published data and our results have been compared, we may conclude that our title polymer is expected to have larger energy gap with respect to bridged or unbridged mono or heterocyclic polymers.…”
Section: Theoretical Electronic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The bands featured in the 300-550nmr egion were investigated in this study because these bands were most clearly identified.N SB showeda similar absorption maximum as X-34, assigning to the p-p* transition, whereas the absorption maximum of TSB was 35 nm redshifted due to an enhanced planarity and conjugation length through the backbonec omparedw ith X-34. [23][24][25] QSB and BTDSB, which have donor-p-acceptor-p-donor (D-p-Ap-D)-typee lectronics tructure, displayed two absorption maxima. The use of nitrogen-containing heterocyclics as effective electron acceptors has been reported previously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, from the histology experiments, the level of conformational freedom along the conjugated backbone was identified as a novel criterion for spectral separation of Aβ aggregates and NFTs. To verify all these findings, p-FTAA was subjected to further molecular engineering and as phenyl moieties previously have been utilized to disrupt the planarity of oligothiophenes, 41 43 two co-oligomers termed p-FTAA-Ph and p-FTAA-MeOPh with the central thiophene ring replaced with a phenyl ring, were synthesized (Figure 4 , Scheme 4 ). The aim with these designs was to create pentameric analogues to p-FTAA that have a nonplanar backbone with a disrupted conjugation length as well as a sterically restricted center.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%