“…instructor observations, student evaluations, comments and/or surveys) to evaluate the effectiveness of the approach (White, 1996;Lung, 1999;Viti, 2000;Sullivan-Catlin, 2002;Griffiths, 2010;Burns, 2013;Purinton, 2014). This same problem is found in the library instruction literature, which mainly consists of case studies, essays and blog posts (Greenwood and Frisbie, 1998;Barry, 2011;Piper and Tag, 2011;Tagge, 2012;Stahura and Milanese, 2013;Valentine and Wukovitz, 2013). The lack of peer-reviewed articles is likely because of the emerging nature of the topic, as well as the difficulty in devising tests to measure student learning, or in conducting an approved study with students that compares a traditional course design versus a thematic approach without any other variables.…”