The World Intellectual Property Organization and the sustainable development agenda

Bannerman, Sara

doi:10.1016/j.futures.2020.102586

Cited by 19 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…4 IP plays an important role in relation to many of the sustainable development goals (SDGs), including those related to food and agriculture, health, innovation, climate change, biodiversity, and technology transfer. 5 In an ideal world, a sustainable development agenda for the international IP system would include a "universal call to action" to ensure that the international IP system contributes to ending poverty, protecting the planet, and ensuring "that all people enjoy peace and prosperity". 6 As evidence of the role of IP in any business organization it has been stated that the IP system almost certainly helps sustainable development.…”

Section: Literature Review and Benefit Of Gismentioning

confidence: 99%

Valuing local heritage: Issue and challenges of geographical indication protection for local artisans in Indonesia Kasongan village heritage

Asri

Sriyono

Hapsari

et al. 2021

World Intellectual Property

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many studies and research that are emphasizing on intellectual property rights (IPR) tend to be focused on standardized products in established markets. This study comes from one fundamental inquiry; how to determine the value of IPR for creative products, in this case, the product of art such as handicraft? This study paper presents a study case focusing on analyzing the IPRs for handicraft products especially pottery crafts in Kasongan, Bantul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. This study focused on the evaluation of geographical indication (GI) from its juridical impact to legal protection. The data were carefully collected through library studies and field studies. The analysis begins with data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and finally, the conclusion. From this study it is found that GI legal protection will be financially beneficial for Kasongan pottery craftsmen, thus increasing its urgency to be registered in GI to sustain the industry. Furthermore, this study also describes Kasongan product's characteristic that has different characteristics from earthenware and handicraft products from other regions in Indonesia. This study focused to complements the literature on managing and evaluating GI regulation particularly in Indonesia, while discussing current situation, problems, and challenges ahead.

show abstract

Section: Literature Review and Benefit Of Gismentioning

confidence: 99%

Valuing local heritage: Issue and challenges of geographical indication protection for local artisans in Indonesia Kasongan village heritage

Asri

Sriyono

Hapsari

et al. 2021

World Intellectual Property

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…804 Professor Sara Bannerman has called for a substantive reform agenda, which considers the full panoply of sustainable development goals. 805 The author of this submission has argued that regional trade agreements 801…”

Section: Recommendation 25mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry on the Right to Repair

Rimmer

2021

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Productivity Commission is to be congratulated for producing a comprehensive discussion paper on the complex and tangled topic of the right to repair. Taking an interdisciplinary, holistic approach to the issue, the Productivity Commission shows a strong understanding that the topic of the right to repair is a multifaceted policy issue. Its draft report covers the fields of consumer law, competition policy, intellectual property, product stewardship, and environmental law. The Productivity Commission displays a great comparative awareness of developments in other jurisdictions in respect of the right to repair.The policy body is also sensitive to the international dimensions of the right to repairparticularly in light of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The Productivity Commission puts forward a compelling package of recommendations, which will be useful in achieving law reform in respect of the right to repair in Australia. Recommendation 2There is a strong body of evidence that intellectual property restrictions do impact upon the right to repair. The evidence is more than merely anecdotal or patchy (as suggested by Draft Finding 5.1). There has been threats of litigation in respect of copyright relating to repair manuals. The High Court of Australia and the Australian Parliament have expressed concerns about the breadth of technological protection measures. There has been major litigation over the spare parts exception under designs law. There has been major litigation over patent law, and the distinction between repair and refurbishment. There has been policy discussion about repair information and trade secrets -resulting in action by Treasury and the Australian Parliament. Recommendation 3This submission agrees with draft finding 5.1 that 'copyright laws that prevent third-party repairers from accessing repair information (such as repair manuals and diagnostic data) appear to be one of the more significant intellectual property-related barriers to repair.' The submission would also contend that other forms of intellectual property do also create significant barriers to repair, which need to be addressed by policy-makers.

show abstract

“…En 1967 se creó la Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual (OMPI), como un organismo especializado del sistema de organizaciones de las Naciones Unidas, para desarrollar un sistema de propiedad intelectual internacional, que sea equilibrado, accesible, recompense la creatividad, estimule la innovación y contribuya al desarrollo económico, salvaguardando a la vez el interés público (Bannerman, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Indicadores de gestión del Instituto Peruano de Energía Nuclear en el período 2000 – 2020

2023

GCTI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Se analiza los indicadores de producción en el período 2000 – 2020 del Instituto Peruano de Energía Nuclear (IPEN), institución que investiga y aplica los conocimientos de la radiación ionizante. Entre los años 1984 y 2000, el IPEN publicaba en promedio un artículo por año. El año 2001 se triplicó las remuneraciones del personal, lo que permitió la incorporación de investigadores con experiencia en publicaciones científicas. Además, entre el año 2001 y 2006 se aplicó una política de incentivo a la investigación y al impulso de las otras actividades del IPEN. Esta política fue desmontada el año 2007. El número de publicaciones pasó de 1 en el año 2001 a 15 el año 2007. El número de servicios tecnológicos pasó de 209 en el 2001 a 1562 el año 2009. La producción de radiofármacos pasó de 820 curios en el 2001 a 1171 el año 2005. Luego de ese crecimiento, los indicadores decayeron. La excepción fue el número de autorizaciones a otras instituciones para el uso de fuentes de radiación ionizante, el que siguió las oscilaciones del crecimiento económico. Descriptores: producción científica y tecnológica, gestión del conocimiento, radioisótopos, radiofármacos, inspecciones nucleares.

show abstract

The World Intellectual Property Organization and the sustainable development agenda

Cited by 19 publications

References 12 publications

Valuing local heritage: Issue and challenges of geographical indication protection for local artisans in Indonesia Kasongan village heritage

Valuing local heritage: Issue and challenges of geographical indication protection for local artisans in Indonesia Kasongan village heritage

A Submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry on the Right to Repair

Indicadores de gestión del Instituto Peruano de Energía Nuclear en el período 2000 – 2020

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About