Abstract:The purpose of the article is to look at how far the functioning of Council working groups contributes to a supranational or to an intergovernmental communication network. For this we use data collected by interviewing diplomats and civil servants involved in these working groups. Our analysis consists of three steps. First, we describe the communication networks in general. Secondly, we look at how far Member States' representatives perceive similarities between their potential partners. Thirdly, we investiga… Show more
“…Juncos & Pomorska, 2011). Beyers and Dierickx (1998) contend that nationality -while remaining important in many respects -is diluted in the Council as a supranational network develops in juxtaposition to the intergovernmental characteristics of agents. In the context of the Council of Europe, Checkel (2003) has also found that social agents go 'native', to some extent.…”
Enhancing the role of national parliaments in the European Union's decisionmaking process has for some time been a popular way in which policymakers have sought to address legitimacy problems in the European Union, the Early Warning Mechanism being only one example. In response to these developments, an increasing number of scholars have addressed the question of how parliaments make use of these powers in practice. An important dimension of the process -the role of parliamentary officials in parliamentary scrutiny and control -has so far been neglected in the literature. Against this background, this article examines the role of the representatives of national parliaments in the European Parliament with the aim of understanding the role and the nature of this 'bureaucratic network'. While falling short of an epistemic community, these officials play an important role in enabling parliamentary scrutiny through the dissemination of information.
“…Juncos & Pomorska, 2011). Beyers and Dierickx (1998) contend that nationality -while remaining important in many respects -is diluted in the Council as a supranational network develops in juxtaposition to the intergovernmental characteristics of agents. In the context of the Council of Europe, Checkel (2003) has also found that social agents go 'native', to some extent.…”
Enhancing the role of national parliaments in the European Union's decisionmaking process has for some time been a popular way in which policymakers have sought to address legitimacy problems in the European Union, the Early Warning Mechanism being only one example. In response to these developments, an increasing number of scholars have addressed the question of how parliaments make use of these powers in practice. An important dimension of the process -the role of parliamentary officials in parliamentary scrutiny and control -has so far been neglected in the literature. Against this background, this article examines the role of the representatives of national parliaments in the European Parliament with the aim of understanding the role and the nature of this 'bureaucratic network'. While falling short of an epistemic community, these officials play an important role in enabling parliamentary scrutiny through the dissemination of information.
“…At least four studies of the pre-2004 Councils identify the North-South division as the main cleavage (Beyers and Dierickx 1998: 312, Mattila and Lane 2001: 45, Elgström et al 2001: 121, Zimmer et al 2005. 33 A survey of 125 EU experts by Thomson et al (2004) reveals the sources of this cleavage:…”
Section: Contested Council Legislation On Social Policy and On Regulamentioning
“…Kohler-Koch (2002a), for instance, has characterised the committees as transnational spaces of communication and as social systems with a social logic of their own, characterised by shared commitment to finding common solutions. A number of previous studies have shown that EU committees 164 Economic Government of the EU tend to develop into team-spirited working-groups in which the participants work closely together and gain confidence in one another (Hanny and Wessels 1998;Beyers and Dierickx 1998). Neyer (1997a, 1997b) even see the EU committees as examples of the development of a co-operative and deliberative culture in the EU.…”
Section: Administrative Networking In the Eumentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.