The conventional approach to international organization is based on the assumption that governments aim at 'the public interest'. It is a normative theory which -without much questioning -is also applied as a positive theory: it is supposed to justify andexplain international organization at the same time. If some specifically positive analysis is added, it usually attempts to explain why international organization is less extensive than appears to be desirable. The conventional approach does not deny that international organization may sometimes be counter-productive. But it does not provide a systematic explanation of such institutional and policy failures. The central thesis of this paper is that there exists a systematic explanation for these failures and that it must be grounded on public choice theory.The following analysis deals with the activities of international agencies and with the international negotiations among governments. Both are subsumed under the heading of international organization. The first part of the paper summarizes the conventional approach and draws attention to its limitations and abuses. In the second part, the new approach to international organization is presented and its three main implications are derived and confronted with the evidence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.