2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The welfare state as a determinant of women’s health: support for women’s quality of life in Canada and four comparison nations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as Raphael and Bryant's50 research has noted, women's health is more sensitive to public welfare and is improved by high levels of state social welfare, so Bartley's49 assertion that analysing the social sphere is challenging and complex is therefore well made. The intersectional nature of inequality—gender, social class and ethnic stratifications—is therefore also something that needs to be considered in future cross-national research on health 51…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as Raphael and Bryant's50 research has noted, women's health is more sensitive to public welfare and is improved by high levels of state social welfare, so Bartley's49 assertion that analysing the social sphere is challenging and complex is therefore well made. The intersectional nature of inequality—gender, social class and ethnic stratifications—is therefore also something that needs to be considered in future cross-national research on health 51…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political economy perspectives that require inter-disciplinary activities would help provide clear implications for policy development. Some work in Canada has begun to address these issues but it is an extremely undeveloped area (see [18,19,[52][53][54][55][56]). …”
Section: Need For Better Conceptualization Of Non-market Economic Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while the relationship between income inequality and population health has been examined in several cross-national studies during the last three decades [19,20], few studies have explored the relationship between political variables and population health at the national level (e.g. [14][15][16]18,21]) and none, to our knowledge, has included a comprehensive number of political variables to understand their effect on population health, while simultaneously adjusting for economic determinants. Muntaner et al [17] included a wide range of variables although their analysis was based on GDP adjusted cross-sectional correlations [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%