1986
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210960226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Verwey Transition in Polycrystalline Cobalt-Iron Ferrites

Abstract: The Verwey transition is analyzed by measuring the initial permeability as a function of tempera‐ture in polycrystalline CoxFe3‐xO4 (with 0 ≦ x ≦ 0.04). The transition temperature slightly decreases with cobalt concentration. A small impurity concentration (≦ 5%) is sufficient to wipe out any sign of the transition. Most samples show a marked thermal hysteresis between heating and cooling curves above the transition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5͒ indicates two transitions in both the FC and NFC measurements. The first dramatic intensity reduction at 120 K may be attributed to the Verwey transition as observed by others 5,23,32,[64][65][66] with the higher temperature transition indicating the blocking temperature ͑ϳ315 K͒. The T B values observed here are within a 50 K range of those reported for cobalt ferrites and suggest larger relative particle size and increased relaxation time, although the exact mechanism responsible for blocking temperature value is controversial.…”
Section: Temperature Dependence Of the Magnetizationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…5͒ indicates two transitions in both the FC and NFC measurements. The first dramatic intensity reduction at 120 K may be attributed to the Verwey transition as observed by others 5,23,32,[64][65][66] with the higher temperature transition indicating the blocking temperature ͑ϳ315 K͒. The T B values observed here are within a 50 K range of those reported for cobalt ferrites and suggest larger relative particle size and increased relaxation time, although the exact mechanism responsible for blocking temperature value is controversial.…”
Section: Temperature Dependence Of the Magnetizationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Indeed, as reported by Abellan et al, the Verwey transition in Co y Fe 3−y O 4 disappears when y is larger than 0.04. 36 In our NHSs, the presence of metal phases strongly increases M S (30% more at room temperature) and the coercive field (90% more) with respect to those of magnetite NPs (for example, 42 nm magnetite NPs exhibit M S = 89 A m 2 kg −1 and μ 0 H C = 0.021 T, at room temperature). 37 It is interesting to note that when the hysteresis loop was measured at low temperature (5 K) after a 5 T FC procedure, no evidence of exchange bias occurred.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…With decreasing temperature, the structure changes from cubic to monoclinic associated with an abrupt decrease of conductivity, lower magnetic susceptibility, and increased magnetocrystalline anisotropy while its magnetic anisotropy easy axis changes from <111> to <100> [31,32]. Cation substitution (in particular by Co), oxygen vacancies, and stress are known to influence the transition temperature [33]. Another type of phase transition, known as Morin transition [34], is found in hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ) at T M ∼ 250 K. Above T M , hematite is a weak ferromagnet [35,36] with spins lying in the basal c-plane of the rhombohedral lattice [35][36][37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%