The value of subjective evaluation in clinical research

Rayson, Jack H.; Rahn, Arthur O.; Ellinger, Charles W.; Wesley, Robert C.; Frazier, Quentin Z.; Lutes, Marvin R.; Henderson, Davis; Haley, John V.

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(71)90040-0

Cited by 25 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Tongue position in relation to the mandibular prosthesis may vary and thus influence the retention score. The finding that complete inter-assessor agreement on retention evaluation was achieved for less than half of the maxillary and mandibular prostheses (Table 1) is below the results obtained by Rayson et al (1971). Using a seven point scale that group, on average, achieved complete agreement for about half the prostheses evaluated.…”

Section: Discussion / Inter-assessor Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 62%

“…Testing procedures and definitions used for assessing retention and stability were similar to those employed by Rayson et al (1971):…”

Section: Detention and Stabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Statements pertaining to the quality of complete prostheses and the effect of the prosthesis on the residual ridge are often based on purely subjective observations and in recognition of this shortcoming attempts have been made by several investigators to develop reliable evaluation systems (Nyquist, 1952;Bergman, Carlsson & Hedegard, 1961;Konduner & Marken, 1967;Rayson et al, 1971).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The reliability of clinical evaluation of some characteristics in complete prosthetics

Ramstad

Norheim

Eckersberg

1980

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this investigation was to study intra-assessor reliability and the relationship between individual and simultaneous evaluations when retention and stability of complete prostheses and the condition of the residual ridges were clinically assessed according to defined criteria. Further, inter-assessor reliability and the reliability of simultaneous evaluations were studied by evaluating the condition of the residual ridge on two occasions. Nine patients and three prosthodontists participated. Generally, the reliability levels were low and individual deviations from the simultaneous evaluations were common.

show abstract

Section: Discussion / Inter-assessor Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 62%

“…Testing procedures and definitions used for assessing retention and stability were similar to those employed by Rayson et al (1971):…”

Section: Detention and Stabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The reliability of clinical evaluation of some characteristics in complete prosthetics

Ramstad

Norheim

Eckersberg

1980

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Each clinician performed his evaluation independently. The criteria used depended on the studies of [21] and [4]. Each patient was assessed by using a seven-point scale (1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4) (Fig.…”

Section: Evaluation Of the Posterior Retention Of The Upper Denturementioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the conventional method for establishing the posterior palatal seal

Salloum

2012

King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Providing sufficient posterior palatal seal (PPS) of a maxillary denture is necessary for retention. This research was designed to estimate the arbitrary scraping method used for establishing the PPS.Methods and material: Eight complete edentulous patients were selected. They received conventional complete dentures by using a scraping method for establishing the PPS. The posterior retention of the maxillary dentures was measured, the postpalatal area for each patient was visually estimated, and smears were made from the postpalatal areas at insertion appointment, 7, 30, and 90 days after denture placement.Result: The study revealed that the posterior retention of the maxillary dentures did not change during the stages of the study, and the epithelium of the postpalatal area converted gradually to a keratinized one.Conclusion: It is concluded that the scraping method used for establishing the PPS is an effective and safe technique.

show abstract

“…Generally, in clinical studies, results during subjective evaluation can be similar to those in objective evaluation following the use of concrete evaluation criteria. 5,6 Therefore, in Akasaka's report, 4 focusing on the height of the alveolar ridge, the relationship between the subjective intraoral evaluation by dentists with different lengths of clinical experience and the objective morphometric evaluation of study models was investigated to improve the reproducibility and universality of subjective evaluation. As a result, differences in evaluation were large among individuals and groups based on the duration of clinical experience.…”

Section: Oral Comfortmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Projects related to Dentures Published in 2005 by Members of the Japan Prosthodontic Society: A Review

Ishigami

2006

Prosthodont Res. Pract.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The value of subjective evaluation in clinical research

Cited by 25 publications

References 0 publications

The reliability of clinical evaluation of some characteristics in complete prosthetics

The reliability of clinical evaluation of some characteristics in complete prosthetics

Evaluation of the conventional method for establishing the posterior palatal seal

Research Projects related to Dentures Published in 2005 by Members of the Japan Prosthodontic Society: A Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About