2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity and utility of the California Family Risk Assessment under practice conditions in the field: A prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
23
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Most adolescent research on suicide risk assessment has been conducted in psychiatric settings, and the vast majority of studies on violence risk assessment have focused on justice settings. Similarly, thus far, studies on the assessment of risk of victimization have focused only on child welfare and protection settings (e.g., Baird & Wagner, 2000; Camasso & Jagannathan, 2000; Johnson, 2011; Price-Robertson & Bromfield, 2011). …”
Section: Taking Stock: the State Of Adolescent Violence And Recidivismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most adolescent research on suicide risk assessment has been conducted in psychiatric settings, and the vast majority of studies on violence risk assessment have focused on justice settings. Similarly, thus far, studies on the assessment of risk of victimization have focused only on child welfare and protection settings (e.g., Baird & Wagner, 2000; Camasso & Jagannathan, 2000; Johnson, 2011; Price-Robertson & Bromfield, 2011). …”
Section: Taking Stock: the State Of Adolescent Violence And Recidivismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several instruments have been developed for the early identification of families at risk for child maltreatment and their validity has been assessed; for example, the California Family Risk Assessment (CFRA) in the USA or the Instrument for Identification of Parents at Risk for Child Abuse and Neglect (IPARAN) in the Netherlands (20,21). While there are no such comprehensive national instruments in Japan, some obstetrics hospitals and health organizations evaluate perinatal risk using their own methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O instrumento orienta o profissional na estimativa do risco de negligência e outras formas de abuso, classificando as famílias como apresentando um risco baixo, moderado, elevado ou muito elevado, a partir da identificação de fatores de risco referidos na literatura e empiricamente sustentados. O CFRS apresenta duas escalas de dez itens, distintas, para estimativa do risco de negligência e de abuso e tem apresentado boa validade preditiva (Johnson, 2011;Johnson & Wagner, 2003). Para este estudo, foi feita uma tradução e adaptação do instrumento para a população portuguesa realizada pelos autores.…”
Section: Instrumentosunclassified