Abstract:There are few studies evaluating the effect of ShotBlocker on pain acquired from intramuscular injection, and these are mostly in children. We hypothesized that the use of ShotBlocker, while administering an intramuscular injection, would reduce the pain and anxiety due to intramuscular injection in adults. A randomized, placebo controlled trial was carried out for more than 20 months in 2010-2011 on 180 adults aged 18 to 80 years who received intramuscular injections of diclofenac sodium (75 mg/3 mL) at the o… Show more
“…The five RCTs (Barnhill et al, ; Çelik & Khorshid, ; Kara & Yapucu Güneş, ; Rock, ; Yilmaz, Khorshid, et al, ) provided detailed information about the randomization process. These studies had low random sequence generation bias; bias with the other study was unclear (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies (Alavi, ; Barnhill et al, ; Çelik & Khorshid, ; Chung et al, ; Yilmaz, Khorshid, et al, ) had high‐risk levels of bias. In one study, there was no blinding of the patients and personnel (Alavi, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ShotBlocker, invented by James Huttner, is another tool to reduce pain at the IM injection site (ShotBlocker, http://www.bionix.com). Çelik and Khorshid’s () results suggested that the ShotBlocker can be considered a pain‐relieving tool for IM injections. A study that examined the effectiveness of air‐lock use has revealed that the usage of air‐lock causes less pain (Yilmaz, Dikmen, et al, ).…”
Aims
To assess the effectiveness of physical‐procedural interventions in reducing pain during intramuscular injections.
Design
Systematic review and meta‐analysis.
Method
English keywords were used to search databases [MEDLINE (OVID, Ebsco), SCOPUS, Science Direct, COCHRANE and the reference lists from retrieved articles] from their inception to November 2017 and randomized and quasi‐experimental trials were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The standardized mean difference and random effects model were used.
Results
From 2,318 articles, 15 articles (1996–2017) met the criteria for the meta‐analysis. Physical‐procedural interventions described in the articles were included in this systematic review. The overall standardized mean difference was 0.595 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.417–0.773), indicating a moderate effect on pain levels. Generally, these interventions (two‐needle technique, acupressure, manual pressure, ShotBlocker, Z‐technique, air‐lock technique, injection site postinjection massage, and speed of injection) have been found to moderately reduce pain.
Conclusion
It seems difficult to conclude that a single intervention reduces pain in adults. However, we can state that the most effective interventions for reducing pain during intramuscular injections in adults involve the ventrogluteal site, the Z‐technique, and manual pressure.
Impact
The systematic review will provide guidance to clinicians, staff, and educator nurses and future studies. The systematic review will help nurses and educators apply techniques based on evidence in any setting. The systematic review will guide well‐designed and well‐reported studies to contribute to the accumulation of evidence in nursing research.
“…The five RCTs (Barnhill et al, ; Çelik & Khorshid, ; Kara & Yapucu Güneş, ; Rock, ; Yilmaz, Khorshid, et al, ) provided detailed information about the randomization process. These studies had low random sequence generation bias; bias with the other study was unclear (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies (Alavi, ; Barnhill et al, ; Çelik & Khorshid, ; Chung et al, ; Yilmaz, Khorshid, et al, ) had high‐risk levels of bias. In one study, there was no blinding of the patients and personnel (Alavi, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ShotBlocker, invented by James Huttner, is another tool to reduce pain at the IM injection site (ShotBlocker, http://www.bionix.com). Çelik and Khorshid’s () results suggested that the ShotBlocker can be considered a pain‐relieving tool for IM injections. A study that examined the effectiveness of air‐lock use has revealed that the usage of air‐lock causes less pain (Yilmaz, Dikmen, et al, ).…”
Aims
To assess the effectiveness of physical‐procedural interventions in reducing pain during intramuscular injections.
Design
Systematic review and meta‐analysis.
Method
English keywords were used to search databases [MEDLINE (OVID, Ebsco), SCOPUS, Science Direct, COCHRANE and the reference lists from retrieved articles] from their inception to November 2017 and randomized and quasi‐experimental trials were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The standardized mean difference and random effects model were used.
Results
From 2,318 articles, 15 articles (1996–2017) met the criteria for the meta‐analysis. Physical‐procedural interventions described in the articles were included in this systematic review. The overall standardized mean difference was 0.595 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.417–0.773), indicating a moderate effect on pain levels. Generally, these interventions (two‐needle technique, acupressure, manual pressure, ShotBlocker, Z‐technique, air‐lock technique, injection site postinjection massage, and speed of injection) have been found to moderately reduce pain.
Conclusion
It seems difficult to conclude that a single intervention reduces pain in adults. However, we can state that the most effective interventions for reducing pain during intramuscular injections in adults involve the ventrogluteal site, the Z‐technique, and manual pressure.
Impact
The systematic review will provide guidance to clinicians, staff, and educator nurses and future studies. The systematic review will help nurses and educators apply techniques based on evidence in any setting. The systematic review will guide well‐designed and well‐reported studies to contribute to the accumulation of evidence in nursing research.
“…The VAS is the most widely used (one-dimensional) tool for measuring pain around the world [24]) using a straight 10-cm line representing the words "no pain" at the left-most end and "worst pain imaginable" at the right-most end. The patients mark this line according to the extent of their pain, and then a numerical representation of their pain severity is determined by measuring the distance between the left-most end and the point where the patients have marked [25]. This tool has been widely used in national and international studies and its validity and reliability have been demonstrated [12].…”
Background: It is widely accepted that pain is the most common complaint during invasive nursing procedures, which causes anxiety in patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of family presence on the level of pain and anxiety of patients during invasive nursing procedures in emergency department.Methods: The present non-randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 70 patients referred to emergency department at selected hospital affiliated to Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in 2018, who were selected by convenience sampling method and then randomly assigned into two groups of intervention (even days) and control (odd days). The invasive nursing procedure was performed for the intervention group in the family presence for physical and psychological support and for the control group without the family presence. Data collection tools were the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). SPSS version 23 software was used to compare the mean scores of pain and anxiety using independent t-test.Results: The mean pain score after the invasive procedure had no significant difference between the intervention group (3.9±1.5) and the control group (4.7±1.9) (P=0.073). In the intervention group, the mean score of anxiety after invasive procedure was significantly lower than before the invasive procedure (P=0.028), whereas the control group showed no change (P=0.556).Conclusion: The family presence during the invasive nursing procedures reduced the anxiety of patients but had no effect on their pain. Emergency nurses can take advantage of family presence during invasive procedures as a non-pharmacological intervention to reduce patients' anxiety.
“…Since IM injection pain results from damage to the tissue and is one of the most common complications of IM injection, it should not be underestimated. [ 3 5 6 7 ] Although many studies have addressed pharmacological and nonpharmacological methods of IM pain reduction,[ 6 ] research continues to find more effective techniques to reduce it. [ 8 ] Since applying new techniques of IM injection and creating an enjoyable experience are of the ethical and legal duties of nurses,[ 5 ] gaining skill in injection based on most recent studies has long been considered by nursing science.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.