2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of qualitative comparative analysis to identify pathways to successful and failed sanitation systems

Abstract: Sanitation systems globally fail at high rates. Researchers and practitioners attribute the causes of both sanitation success and failure to numerous factors that include technical and non-technical issues. A comprehensive understanding of what leads to sanitation failure and how to achieve sanitation success is imperative to prioritize the use of limited resources. To determine which combinations of causal conditions led to successful and failed sanitation systems, we applied fuzzy-set qualitative comparative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in mega and secondary cities that are presented also significantly help in planning for SSS in particular. Lack of monitoring leads to poor operation and maintenance, which then leads to poor performance of systems, and ultimately results in failure of SSS, as proved in India (Davis et al, 2019;Ulrich et al, 2019). The present SNA has been shown to identify the actors who are best suited to carry out the long-term monitoring of SSS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in mega and secondary cities that are presented also significantly help in planning for SSS in particular. Lack of monitoring leads to poor operation and maintenance, which then leads to poor performance of systems, and ultimately results in failure of SSS, as proved in India (Davis et al, 2019;Ulrich et al, 2019). The present SNA has been shown to identify the actors who are best suited to carry out the long-term monitoring of SSS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the government plays an important role in achieving full coverage of sanitation services. In the past, it was not a priority, and there were deliberate actions that permanently disrupted a sanitation system's use, maintenance, and performance, thereby creating mistrust and expectations from people for free services from the government, even when they are not poor [3,63]. Likewise, direct user and stakeholder participation, as well as empowerment by intermediate-level organizations, can provide an avenue to identify the needs of the community [57,64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of this combination is that the largest proportion of studies included in the review appears to use complex analytical methods to assess an issue at the local-services level (e.g., household, community) ( Figure 4). Examples of this genre of systems approaches include evaluating contextual, technical, social, and financial detriments of handpump functionality through Bayesian network analysis [72], using agent-based modeling to assess household water quality [73], and the application of fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis for assessing failure in community sanitation projects [74]. This trend suggests that few of the methods intended for addressing local service sustainability issues are likely accessible to those who are tasked with making critical decisions at the local level around WASH service provision.…”
Section: Diversifying Methods Analytical Complexity and Wash Scopementioning
confidence: 99%