The use of positively valued adjectives and adverbs in Polish and Estonian casual conversations

Vainik, Ene; Brzozowska, Dorota

doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.001

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Berbagai penelitian terdahulu yang mengaplikasikan teori appraisal antar lain penelitian appraisal pada wacana media masa (Sabao, 2016); (Mayo & Taboada, 2017); (Ross & Caldwell, 2020), wacana media sosial (Tran & Ngo, 2018); (Yao & Ngai, 2021); (Vinagre & Corral Esteban, 2018), wacana interview korban kekerasan (Sutherland & Adendorff, 2015); (Katz et al,), wacana iklan (Beangstrom & Adendorff, 2013); percakapan sehari-hari (Vainik & Brzozowska, 2019), bidang Pendidikan dan interaksi di ruang kelas (Cheung & Low, 2017); (Chen & Zheng, 2019); (Lin & Lau, 2021), lirik lagu (Li, 2016) dan pada penilaian produk (Hommerberg & Don, 2015). Adapun penelitian yang fokus pada analisis appraisal terhadap sikap tour guide dalam virtual tour masih jarang dilakukan.…”

Section: Gambar 1 Hasil Analisis Metadata Penelitian Virtual Tour Men...unclassified

Tour Guide Attitude and Tourist Response in Virtual Tour: Appraisal Analysis

2022

kata

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regardless of its importance in tourism, the use of appraisal theory in tourism research, particularly in the context of virtual tours, is relatively unexplored. This study aims to analyze the attitude of tour guides when describing tourist attractions and to find out the response of tourists. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. Data collection techniques were carried out by observation, documentation and questionnaires. Based on the appraisal analysis of the tour guides, there are two types of positive attitudes; affect (1%) and appreciation (99%). Tourists’ responses in the form of their satisfaction were measured by questionnaires based on the theory of tourist attraction and consumer satisfaction theory with the Likert model assessment technique. Tourists were given a questionnaire to find out whether they were satisfied with the virtual tour. They responded by strongly agree (28%), agree (49%) and neutral answer (22%). Those who responded disagree were only 1%. The tourist responses indicate that most tourists are satisfied with the virtual tour.

show abstract

Section: Gambar 1 Hasil Analisis Metadata Penelitian Virtual Tour Men...unclassified

Tour Guide Attitude and Tourist Response in Virtual Tour: Appraisal Analysis

2022

kata

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In order to evaluate a particular object or phenomenon of reality, a person perceives it through his sensory and cognitive mechanisms: the nature of the evaluation corresponds to the nature of the person, it "cannot be independent from the person, and if the life of Mankind has a goal, the evaluation explicitly or implicitly subordinates this goal" (Arutyunova, 1999, p. 427). For example, Polish scholars discussed the background of axiological semantics while analyzing cultural differences between Polish and Estonian conversational strategies in the use of evaluative words (Vainik & Brzozowska, 2019). The positive sensory experience is connected with harmonious interaction of the human with the external environment.…”

Section: Evaluative Aspectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Linguistic Representation Of Human Sensations In Modern English

Ivanova¹

2020

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…identification of discursive and cultural features of the community: "Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Parameters of UpperClass Ageing Women's Speech" (Tislenkova, Tikhaeva, 2020), "The hurting and healing power of words (and grammatical constructions). A cognitive grammar study of the interactive and interpersonal effects of a directive constuction in Polish" (Kochanska, 2018), "Impoliteness, aggression and the moral order" (Parvaresh, Tayebi, 2018), "Globalization, conflict discourse, and Jewish identity in an Israeli Russian-speaking online community" (Perelmutter, 2018), "The use of positively valued adjectives and adverbs in Polish and Estonian casual conversations" (Vainik, Brzozowska, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Symbols in the Ukrainian Public Discourse (Analysis of Presidential Speeches on the Occasion of Constitution Day)

Kryvenko

2021

KMLPJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article develops the understanding of symbols as a certain type of signs, the meaning of which is established by agreement or habit. There is an opinion that symbols in public discourse are a reflection of values and anti-values of the society, which are formed in the process of mass communication. This article identifies the main features of the characters, including emotional engagement, attachment to a particular act of communication, as well informativeness. The types of meaning are determined, and the mechanism of nomination is explained. The article reveals the concept of semantic competition. M. Edelman’s opinion that value structures can be divided into mono-, bi- and multimodal — depending on the number of values assigned to key symbols. The presidential speeches delivered before the Ukrainian Constitution Day in 2017–2020 were analyzed in this article. Thanks to the content analysis of emotionally colored words, the symbols, which are characteristic for the speeches of P. Poroshenko and V. Zelensky, were identified focusing both on similarities and differences of Ukrainian values and anti-values. This article analyzes the nominations used by speakers to give meaning to key symbols. Aspects of semantic competition of the key symbols are defined here as well. It was revealed that during the tenure of President Poroshenko, other symbols circulated mostly in the Ukrainian public discourse than those during the presidency of V. Zelensky. Among the common key values for both presidents, we can find “Constitution,” “Constitution Day” and “freedom”. There is a semantic competition in their use. Both presidents underline the negative meaning of the term “parliamentary immunity.” Poroshenko expresses the threat using symbols such as “Russian aggressor”, “fifth column,” “corruption,” “Russian Empire” and “war.” On the other hand, V. Zelensky does not use symbols of external threat. It was found that the value structure formed by Poroshenko’s speeches showed signs of bimodality, and the one created by V. Zelensky’s speeches — multimodality.

show abstract

The use of positively valued adjectives and adverbs in Polish and Estonian casual conversations

Cited by 8 publications

References 14 publications

Tour Guide Attitude and Tourist Response in Virtual Tour: Appraisal Analysis

Tour Guide Attitude and Tourist Response in Virtual Tour: Appraisal Analysis

Linguistic Representation Of Human Sensations In Modern English

Symbols in the Ukrainian Public Discourse (Analysis of Presidential Speeches on the Occasion of Constitution Day)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About