2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00226-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of degrees of certainty to evaluate knowledge

Abstract: In patients with chronic diseases education should improve knowledge about the disease and increase certainty in knowledge. We present here a technique to measure changes in certainty after an educational intervention. For this purpose, before and after a course, patients answer a questionnaire in which answers are accompanied by an estimate of the degree of certainty. Answers are then assigned to areas of knowledge defined a priori: mastered (certainty !90%, correctness !90%), hazardous (certainty !90%, corre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
21
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a statistically significant increase in problem solving score between the first and second evaluations. Other skills showed a statistically significant change between the second and third evaluations; there was improvement in self-assessment, self-image, and self-efficacy scores, and a decrease in the dangerous knowledge score (incorrect knowledge with a high degree of certainty) [9,10]. There was a steady increase in the usable knowledge score (correct knowledge with a high degree of certainty) [10] over the three evaluations; this improvement was more marked than that of other skills (p < 0.001).…”
Section: Description Of the Scores And Change Over Timementioning
confidence: 94%
“…There was a statistically significant increase in problem solving score between the first and second evaluations. Other skills showed a statistically significant change between the second and third evaluations; there was improvement in self-assessment, self-image, and self-efficacy scores, and a decrease in the dangerous knowledge score (incorrect knowledge with a high degree of certainty) [9,10]. There was a steady increase in the usable knowledge score (correct knowledge with a high degree of certainty) [10] over the three evaluations; this improvement was more marked than that of other skills (p < 0.001).…”
Section: Description Of the Scores And Change Over Timementioning
confidence: 94%
“…À chaque réponse, le stagiaire a dû associer un niveau de certitude (NC), selon 4 niveaux proposés : réponse très peu sûre <50 % (certitude très faible), réponse peu sûre 50−70% (certitude faible), réponse assez sûre 70−90 % (certitude moyenne), réponse très sûre 90−100 % (certitude totale) [11,12] .…”
Section: Méthodesunclassified
“…Lors de l'évaluation des gestes et des soins d'urgence, à l'instar de ce qui est fait pour d'autres professions (pilote d'avion par exemple) [13] ou en mé-decine d'urgence où la gestion des connaissances est vitale, il a été demandé aux stagiaires d'ajouter à chacune de leur réponse, la probabilité subjective de donner une réponse (bonne ou mauvaise). L'utilisation des degrés de certitude pour quantifier et graduer les connaissances est inspirée des travaux de Leclercq [11] , Bruttomesso et Gagnayre [12] . Toutefois, nous n'avons pas utilisé la règle des « 6 multiples de 20 % » actuellement préconisée par les auteurs de la méthode en cas de questions à ré-ponses ouvertes et courtes (QROC) ou de questions à choix multiples (QCM) [14] .…”
Section: Choix De La Méthodeunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the answers to these questions, the following scores were established: (i) subjective score of the adjustment of the insulin doses; (ii) score of positive health beliefs; (iii) score of knowledge uncertainty, established on the whole set of knowledge questions, and by distinguishing knowledge related to theoretical or practical notions; according to [7,8,[12][13][14], this score was established by giving for each question a score of 0 (when confidence is sure at 98 or 90%) and 1 (tendency to uncertainty) if the answer was equal or lower than 75% of certitude; (iv) score of clarity of explanations provided by the health care providers; (v) score of constraint due to the time devoted to treatment, (vi) score of fear of hypoglycemia. These scores were obtained by adding the values given on the respective Lickert's scales.…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%